neither do I.
Vehement refusing isn't required. I meet a man at a business meeting. We talk and he points his finger at me, a rude and annoying thing to me. He wants to make a point and he pokes me in the shoulder. I don't do anything, I it's over I just tell him don't do it again. Knows he has violated both me and my space.. Legally he has committed a battery. I'm sure in school and else where he's been told to "keep your hands to your self.."
We meet again, he does it again. I didn't yell or talk harshly I had clearly told him before to not do it again. I didn't have to tell him to not touch me, it was clearly a crime and a violation of me the first time. Without my consent he was pushing me around, a bully, a criminal--but only one in his mind.
This man. Now telling a girl to lay down and spread her legs. She doesn't doesn't protest or fight because she knows that it's bast to relax. If she relaxes the less interior damages she'll suffer and the less he might hurt her. He doesn't need a sign "stay out." When he moved her it was a kidnap. Why should she need to do or say something when he took control? He's a bully, a criminal, a rapist and more.
Surprise, surprise women do it too. It's hard to believe because the victim doesn't tell or know it was an object used. So who's to believe something happened when the equipment was not there or was it??
The brutality of rape of course is much worse than a mere poke, the feeling of violation can go on a long time no matter her work,
We know the rules about male/female relationships have changed since I was 17 in 1970. Looking back on your teen and young adult days, were you ever involved in what NOW might be called date rape?
But I'm not sure what the era we grew up in would have to do with it. The phrase "date rape" may not have existed twenty or thirty years ago but no has still always meant no.
meaning you take a girl on a date and you rape her?
was it different in the 70's? i m not ragging but maybe you are confused because in the 70's no to sex was rape regardless if you were on a date with her... or you just randomly saw her, knocked her out and stuck your dick into her while she was screaming "no no no".
weird guy
Date rape can be that. I've had an ex gf in college have it happen to her twice. Both times they were introduced through her grandmother, although her grandmother never revealed she didn't know the boys and barely knew the families. Thanks granny, leaving us soon?
I did know my ex. gf and before the 1st date we were playing footsies while her date was next to her. I was stag.
She kissed better than any provider I've been around and rub against me in bed in her underware on the 3rd date and suddenly did not want to go further. Is this called "she was asking for it" maybe the other 2 guys thought so or they got further, but it was clear to me the witch owned her body without any regard for me. Instead of continuing. I told her she gave too many mixed messages and to leave, but she insisted on dressing first.
Back then the media did not have the "No means No" campaign. In High School we thought once i you're in you made it and the bell can't be unrung. Well how can you? When you heard No you were going expecting "No, Don't, Don't, Don't Stop" lol
Finally, the one question about "No means No" that can puzzle the ancient Greeks.
What would you do if in the middle of great intercoarse, you're told by her to stop? It's time for her favorite TV show. (:- and from prior experience you know a bad case a Blue Balls will set in.
if you force a girl to do what she vehemently refuse to do, that's rape. it's the same definition.
neither do I.
Vehement refusing isn't required. I meet a man at a business meeting. We talk and he points his finger at me, a rude and annoying thing to me. He wants to make a point and he pokes me in the shoulder. I don't do anything, I it's over I just tell him don't do it again. Knows he has violated both me and my space.. Legally he has committed a battery. I'm sure in school and else where he's been told to "keep your hands to your self.."
We meet again, he does it again. I didn't yell or talk harshly I had clearly told him before to not do it again. I didn't have to tell him to not touch me, it was clearly a crime and a violation of me the first time. Without my consent he was pushing me around, a bully, a criminal--but only one in his mind.
This man. Now telling a girl to lay down and spread her legs. She doesn't doesn't protest or fight because she knows that it's bast to relax. If she relaxes the less interior damages she'll suffer and the less he might hurt her. He doesn't need a sign "stay out." When he moved her it was a kidnap. Why should she need to do or say something when he took control? He's a bully, a criminal, a rapist and more.
Surprise, surprise women do it too. It's hard to believe because the victim doesn't tell or know it was an object used. So who's to believe something happened when the equipment was not there or was it??
The brutality of rape of course is much worse than a mere poke, the feeling of violation can go on a long time no matter her work,
