Doesn't work for me either.
Question for the group. It seems that a number of providers lately are doing the Outcall only option.
This is not a good option for me and was curious as to how many other hobbyist this is not an option either.
Maybe some of the outcall only hotties will take notice and make a change. On the otherhand, I may be in the minority.
'Godfather
I don't think you are in the minority. Doesn't work for me. Some outcall only will make exceptions.
It doesn't work for a lot of guys.
I talked to one provider for whom that's why she does it... Many providers don't want a heavy schedule, as they only do this part-time or occasionally. Being outcall-only has a filtering effect, in that it probably elminates 80% or more of the guys from calling, and this keeps the schedule lighter.
incall is much preferable. i think i've only done outcall once in the twin cities.
I live a far enough away that many do not want to travel that far. If those listing outcall only stated how far they would travel I would know whether to consider them, so, I look primarily for incall
Outcall only does help me in saving my money a bit 
as I dont get a chance to be alone at home very often and dont wanna set up a hotel or something myself. It does help me control myself. 
But, it does limit me to very few ladies (and difficulty in schedule matching) and does frustrate when I am looking for somebody.
Though the good thing I like about them coming to my place is the comfort of me being at home. To the fact, I dont really like the hotel / motel set-up as that looks very professional to me and way far from GFE in the "Girl Friend" sense.
I definitely prefer incall; it takes a lot for me to agree to outcall.
Just wondering what it is about outcall you guys are against? I don't mind providing incall, except when it isn't until after I've gotten the room the appointment is canceled. I for one would be more than happy to share the expence of the room, and to put the room in my name.
Hey Suzy,
It's not that most guys are "against" outcall, it's just that for most married guys, it just doesn't work. It's one thing if we're traveling, and we alredy have a room, but it's hard to get a room locally... credit card transactions, etc... It's just plain easier to not deal with it. A few years ago, I actually had a hotel mail me the receipt to my home because I did express checkout. I didn't provide them with my real address, it turns out that I had stayed with that chain before on trips and they had my address on file. Was not an incident, but could have been. It's just simply not a clean enough transaction for most guys.
Remember that much of the appeal of this for the guy is the cleanliness of the transaction. You settle up, put on your shoes, and that's that, no loose ends to clean up... and handling the room is a loose end.
I've gotten a room a few times, and I'm roughly 50/50... That is, I suffered a no-call, no-show about half the time and was out the $ for the room, so I won't consider it any more if it's not someone I know. And if it's someone I already know, that usually means that it's someone that already provides incall.
-- Modified on 10/11/2004 9:51:19 PM
I can't speak for all providers, but for me it is the cost that keeps me from offering incall except for a set incall day. Since I don't have a honey at home to worry about I have no problem having the room in my name.
For me, outcall where I live is simply not an option. It's not because I have any sort of SO living with me; I just don't have the necessary level of privacy to make it work. Thus, I would have to get a room. The combination of the additional expense plus the very real risk of a no-call, no-show is very unappealing. True, the lady runs the same risk but I believe it is far easier for her to find a replacement(given what the ladies say to me about the call volume they receive) than for me to find someone else I want to see on short notice.
hhhhmmm. Incall is the only option for a lot, and I mean a lot, of us men who also have honey's at home
WHAT ABOUT THE PROVIDERS THAT HAVE HONEYS AT HOME AS WELL?
I'm curious how common this is, that a provider is attached and the SO doesn't know.
If neither the hobbyist nor the provider can manage hosting incall, then the deal's off. Not every hobbyist/provider combination will work. There's a fair number of locals that I would love to take for a spin, but since they're outcall only, it's simply not gonna happen. And this isn't meant to be a jab, but given my earlier post about the recent epidemic of no-call no-shows, even by well known providers, outcall is just absolutely out of the question for me now.
I think most of us assume that the provider, having chosen to "put the shingle out" is in the better position to manage the lodging issue. Partly because her lifestyle may accomodate it better. But also, she can often arrange multiple meetings per stay (see Suzy's post) while a hobbyist is probably only going to get one game in per rink rental.
You are not in the minorit, I Must have In Call, cannot handle Outcall....