The guy wrote about a specific part of his experience. Maybe he didn't feel like writing any more. Or maybe he had to stop in the middle because of some pressing business and then found it had been posted before he could revise it, and decided to just let it go. Maybe he's just fixated on breasts and decided to only focus on that part of the session, as there are plenty of other reviews detailing the various sex acts with this provider. Whatever the reason, he didn't violate ter guidelines, which state "Her maximum eligible score is based on what is offered, not what is performed during your session with her."
I have seen lots of reviews with fewer details than this one. What this guy described was pretty hot. Just because there are no acronyms (alphabet codes) does not make it unacceptable. I think ter should restore her review.
Interesting lady came to my attention as a visitor to Boston. Her post encouraged me to check her reviews. Most recent is a 10/10 with juicy details that speak only about breast and nipple play. Huh? Maybe mr Dimelo3004 is a highly regarded reviewer with dozens of reviews and the moderator let him slide. Nope, just one review. His first. Huh, after the many moderator chats I have had (lectures I have received) about making sure 9's and 10's are chock full of the alphabet codes that constitute the rating, the newbie gets a double 10 on his first go without nary a carnal code.
Now I know why I gave up writing at 100.
Course I never was a paying VIP either.
Wonder how long this will last?
ajn (retired writer, occasional reader, frequent player
I've been told to rewrite mine several times and they had more detail than that. Now thats something that makes you go hmmmmm
Let's see if this post makes it to the board.
Know what I mean??
Just tried to look it up and it seems that it was pulled!
End of rant.
ajn
-- Modified on 7/28/2014 7:45:21 AM
-- Modified on 7/28/2014 7:44:50 AM
Did you see it. It should have never been posted.
Nothing was wrong with it- review was cut short but I find it odd that someone had to complain to have it remove.
Reviews can't please everyone I guess.
-- Modified on 7/28/2014 8:47:57 AM
The guy wrote about a specific part of his experience. Maybe he didn't feel like writing any more. Or maybe he had to stop in the middle because of some pressing business and then found it had been posted before he could revise it, and decided to just let it go. Maybe he's just fixated on breasts and decided to only focus on that part of the session, as there are plenty of other reviews detailing the various sex acts with this provider. Whatever the reason, he didn't violate ter guidelines, which state "Her maximum eligible score is based on what is offered, not what is performed during your session with her."
I have seen lots of reviews with fewer details than this one. What this guy described was pretty hot. Just because there are no acronyms (alphabet codes) does not make it unacceptable. I think ter should restore her review.