I'm a very infrequent poster and primarily only see 2 or 3 ladies semi-regularly. So, not an "active" hobbyist. I often read reviews and the discussion boards primarily for entertainment as well as to see if there any hot topics that pique my interest.  

In reading reviews (I take many with a grain of salt) I'm always confused/surprised/dumbfounded when a terrible review is written about  a provider who has nothing but terrible reviews. I've attached a link to show a specific example. I'm not intending to "call out" a specific hobbyist, or provider nor do I want to start any drama. This is just the most recent one that had me scratching my head.

This young lady already had 2 reviews stating basically the same thing that the 3rd hobbyist said in his review. Obviously he is a regular reviewer and has access to see if others have reviewed this girl. What would make someone read the 1st 2 reviews and say...."this is where I want to take the chance of seeing a provider with only 2 reviews (is there an LE risk?) even though both are horrible, spend my hard earned $$ and pass on one of the many, many "sure things" out there where I know I will have a great time with a proven, quality lady"?

After reading the 1st one, my instinct would be to say...nah. Why take the chance? After the 2nd, there is not a chance I would make that call.

Possibly someone has very specific physical attributes that they seek and despite horrific reviews THAT is what they want. Maybe the $$ is the motivating factor. I'm not sure.

Obviously, reviews are one persons opinion and are completely subjective. Have any hobbyists ever seen a lady with terrible reviews and ended up having a great time and thinking completely different than the 1's or 2's or 3's she had recieved from previous visitors