I like your posts the way they are and always look forward to reading it if I'm in the market for a tryst that week.

It saves me the trouble and time of weeding out the bad, fakes and up sells.

I'm a hardworking guy. I'm not a millionaire by any means and I certainly don't want to get burned on a bad session.

Since you've opened the suggestion box I think that there can be a list of  
Established providers  i.e. 5 or more verified reviews verified pics ( dare I say) and not rate them based on scores just that they for good or bad are real

Then the out and out frauds ( which would be the most informative help you could give IMHO) this saves all of us time and money as toftt is never fun and if it can be avoided great.

Then group three.. Listed without opinion as they all are now.

Ashley Taylor or Annabelle apples on the same thread as a stolen pic or Bp ripoff artist is confusing and can only help add credibility to the rip off ad while causing collateral damage to a well know provider.

Plus I'm too dumb to decipher as it is...

How about one list with reviewed ladies and one without reviews. You always post a link to the reviews, so it's up to the client to do their homework. You could also make a notation on any hits for fake pics on either list. You could call each post "The Known" and "Unknown". Might encourage the more adventurous to take a chance on the new ladies.

Nothing personal as I have been a member for about as long as you have been doing the list, and for the life of me I never quite understood what benefit it brought me.  Explaining what is does is a good thing, or just put your much appreciated and valuable time and effort into a better delivery.  I for one didn't care if tineye hit on Polish model so much as if a provider has reviews and who has done the reviewing....my two cents.

on more than a few occasions your posts are the first things that pop up while I'm doing my google search. This is very helpful and has saved me a great deal of time more than once. I would say either keep it as it is or split it into verified and unverified. Verified doesn't mean good or bad, thats for me to decide, just lets me know she is legit. Unverified doesn't have to mean bad/scam or whatever, just means there wasn't enough information available to confirm she was legit. Again, for me to decide whether I want to TOFTT or not. Only other thoughts would be to add Ohio to your lists (selfish request) and include the names of the ladies pictured. I know they are not providers but they are smoking hot and I would love to be able to look for additional pics.

I like the PSA posts just the way they are. I appreciate some of your suggestions for change, but the reason I've always liked the post is because it makes absolutely NO judgment (the misinterpretation of others notwithstanding). It is factual. Indisputable. The photos appear elsewhere or not. There are TER reviews or not. Etc. Etc. Leave it the way it is. And thanks for all your effort.

Hi Lamont

A few humble suggestions:

1) Let us not over complicate this. The aim of your exercise should be to weed out the impostors from the Eros list for the benefit of both the genuine providers and the hobbyist.
2) So please christen it as 'Impostor list' and just make the one list.
3) Anyone who makes that list would either have a stolen photo (or) used someone else's website as their own etc. Basically they have falsified some information on their ad.

I think the above will eliminate a lot of confusion on the purpose of your posts and will benefit this community even more.

Thanks for taking the time to do this every week. My hats off to you.

- A long time hobbyis

I find your post very helpful and efficient.  

I am not sure if you are allowed by TER rules, but I would consider it most helpful if you listed the TER average score.  Currently, I look at the TER page first and if the provider doesn't have a score I have set for a personal minimum, then I keep looking.

I find the list very helpful and am grateful for the work. It recently helped me find a new provider that I like very much.

I suggest having one list but ordering it into three broad sections:
 - green: those who have multiple positive reviews and little if any concerning indicators
 - yellow: those who have either mixed indicators or a lack of indicators
 - red: those that have clearly concerning indicators, such as clearly negative reviews and apparently fake photos

To avoid arguments, you would not have to explicitly state that you have ordered the list. But if you did order it, people would get a sense of it over time, and be able to decide for themselves how far down the list they wanted to look

I think your current list is great and it saves the clients a lot of time, however you only put those visiting Boston and you do not include the Rhode Island ladies.  Can I suggest a separate list of all the top rated providers that are located New England as this list would only need to be updated every few months.

I don't think you need to be that granular to get down to good and bad in terms of reviews.   People can read the reviews and make up their own minds (and while I don't know who shills for the agencies, when I see a single review from a reviewer with a single review, I discount the review accordingly.)  What has been most helpful for me in years as a TER member has been the ability to get information that weeds out the scammers.  And your post has been a key part of that.  While TGTBT is usually self evident from the pictures, I still let the small head do too much of the (wishful) thinking.  So it is very clarifying to see the tineye links on your post and see the scam in print (so to speak).  Your post has saved me a lot of money and aggravation.  Just keep up the good work.  Much appreciated.

Most of you want some version of a good and bad list, or Verified or Unverified and  Known or  
Unknown list which are all good ideas.  

But I still leave me with the big problem of doing this list while staying impartial.  
With some many different idea’s to go thru I thought I would go some of them.

One idea was to have a lady that has 5 plus reviews are on the good list. A list of out and out frauds.
Then a third list of everyone that else no reviews or hits on photos. Not a bad idea but what about the ladies that have a no review policy or ladies with less than 5 reviews they will go on the third list, Most guy in my opinion will look at the second and third list a fake or bait and switch, which mean the list is going to hurt them because they have a no review policy or they don’t have enough review to make the first list.

The same can be said the other idea of Known and Unknown, if a lady has a no review policy or she is new to the business with an agency. These ladies will be put on the unknown list and most guys with think they are fakes.
Add using the Verified and Unverified to this problem to.

As for the idea of adding colors to the post it’s a that’s a real good one, but it has 2 problems,  
1. You are asking me decided who is good, bad or questionable. That is something I don’t want to do.
2. TER is a black and white world, I’m pretty sure they are not going to let me add color to my post.  

  Gina I know you have asked before to do a list of the ladies in New England, but I don’t think you understand the work it would take to do this list. Just to give you an idea, In this year alone from Jan 1.2014 to today 6.25.2014 there are 497 provider that have review in the New England area. Now you want me to list all them in a post.  In another 3 month there will be another 250 new reviews if not more. My question to you is when do you think I would have time to sleep, eat, and take a shower, go to work. Please understand it is a great idea, but what you’re asking for is way too much.

The key thing to remember about this list is, I need to work under the KISS principle (Keep It Simple Silly). Most of these ideas are good, but I need to spend some time to figure out the best way to incorporate them into the list and keeping the list impartial.

Thank again for all your input, and I will give you a heads up when I plan on changing the list.  

Photo disclaimer: the model in the picture is not a provider or associated with any provider agency.  She is just a model for you perverts to stare at with your ravenous eyes.