Showing how the industry has been at odds with the state (CA) going back to 1967, when then Gov. Reagan started targeting pornographic material to the fights of today which deal mostly w/the condom/OSHA laws...
The next piece should be about how much money the Local and state governments are losing because there are less applications for permits to do movies. It should discuss the nut that has left southern California, and how they plan to replace it. Then it should discuss if Michael Winestein is really an ally of the people or someone who is deleterious to local government. Finally it should discuss the newly unemployed and how they got there since there are fewer movies being made in the area.
The Times did a good article on Weinstein last year.
I respect what he is trying to do but the way he goes about doing it is all wrong.