...("I don't know what my wife is doing and I don't give a shit either") as long as he becomes President.
It's a though call, but I would have liked to hear his wife's response to his remark! And, his response in return! ![]()
Almost as stupid as the promise that no illegal aliens would be covered under ObamaCare.
Does anyone believe that???????
Of course, your lies are okay.
Want more?
so their drones never hear about them.
Hear no evil, see no evil.
Oh yeah, Romney is terrible, he sucks dick. Happy laffy?
You make the assumption that one who posts from Huffington Post or the Daily Kos does not read, listen to, or watch any other sources of news. Stupid, stupid, stupid assumption! ![]()
I did'nt say someone like you who sources, what, 80-90% of your posts from huffypo does'nt get info anywhere else.
What I said was that huffypo and dailykook don't aggressively cover Obama "lies/gaffes" etc like they do with Romney and Republicans...Case in point, the cavilier attitude expressed about the illegal coordination between Obama and his "superpacs".
From what I've seen, as much whining and complaining proggies do about "Faux News", (a sure tell you're dealing with a talking pointer zombie), they are blind about their own dependancy of huffypo and dailykoo to get their own thoughts.![]()
-- Modified on 8/9/2012 9:49:45 AM
of course it's a very small step, but what do you expect from someone with the name Mattgina?
Just like nuguy is better than liorr, but only marginally so.
obama till he stated it publically.
which targets he chooses to go after vs those he ignores, where he sources his OP's, that was all coincidence....nothing should be assumed from that...a more astute assumption finder there has never been than matty......Mr Enigma.
I literally roflmfao
That's even richer that Pri claiming to be P&R's "most objective poster" but at least we all now that Pri is just "joshing us" I really believe that Mattgina was stupid enough to think that someone might actually believe him.
it's pretty fucking simple, to quote huffpo or the DailyKook, first of all you have to read them, and anyone who reads either of them regularly is either a masochist or a die hard lib.
Talking about others vs. the issue addressed.
Oop!!! I better be careful or you'll joking about hunting me down and shooting me. lol Perhaps you were just PUI! ![]()
course the fact your last several OP's were huffypo articles means nothing at all.
it would be completely crazy to draw an inference from that, right????
For you a Gag's benefit, are you saying that one can not dislike Romney and be an Independent???
-- Modified on 8/9/2012 10:31:35 AM
or are you simply doing what you criticize others for?
nice try at putting words in my mouth, now i know why you love laffy.
"matty's such an enigma..no one had a clue he was voting for"obama till he stated it publically.
which targets he chooses to go after vs those he ignores, where he sources his OP's, that was all coincidence....nothing should be assumed from that...a more astute assumption finder there has never been than matty......Mr Enigma."
You're weaseling again!!!
You are so far from independent, you might as well be a mirror image to nuguy, except for the fact that you use complete sentences. You even seem to accept Daffy, which puts you in a minority of two, only you and salonpas are so devoid of independent thought that you are willing to suffer a troll like him, just because he shares your loathing of ANYTHING the least bit conservative.
spouting off Republican talking points, have voted for Democrats.
And, because I don't like Romney doesn't mean I'm not Ian Independent, and you thinking I don't appear so, doesn't make your perception true, particularly since you are partisan on the Republican side.
And, yes, as far as laffy goes, I just see him mirroring what those on the right having been doing along, though perhaps a notch or two up, just to make his point. Denial is not a river in Egypt, but it's flowing strong and deep for those, on the right, who can not see themselves in the mirror. ![]()
I'll go first, I voted for Bill Clinton, and never regretted my vote for a minute.
OK, your turn.
state a local offices for me to play this game. I'm much more likely to vote Republican on those levels.
and more importantly, why did you vote for him.
and in the interest of fair play, I will go first again.
I voted for Clinton because number one, I didn't think he was doing too bad a job, but more importantly because it looked pretty certain like the GOP was going to control Congress, and as I have stated before, i don't trust either party to be in complete control. Plus, i really didn't see too much difference between Dole and Clinton, they were both pretty moderate.
Truth be told, I would take either Dole or Clinton today, and I can't even remember if Dole is even still alive. He must be around 90 if he's still alive, but I'd still take him over either Obama or Romney, I'd vote for his wife over either of those two to tell the truth.
-- Modified on 8/9/2012 4:11:42 PM
Felt Bush had much more over Dukakis when it came to national security and foreign policy. Had no trouble with "Read my lips! No, new taxes!" Nor, did I have a problem with him in raising taxes, because he placed the good of the country over ideology. I'm with you regarding Clinton and Bob and Elizabeth Dole, though I doubt either of the latter two could get the nomination today. I would have voted for Colin Powell and Chuck Haggar if they'd ran. Like I mentioned else where, career service people lead colorful lives, which are difficult to pass the vetting process.
...("I don't know what my wife is doing and I don't give a shit either") as long as he becomes President.