I may be all wrong about this and, as a consequence, be ripped a new one in the subsequent posts. Since I am a risk-taker, I will post my opinion anyway and suffer the consequences.
I think the external cumshot anywhere on a woman's body is a contrivance of the porn industry. I don't know if its purpose is to demonstrate that the actors really had sex or that the it was real enough for the guy to have an orgasm. Since an actress can fake an orgasm, I guess the external cumshot is a way for porn producers to convince their viewers that it was "real." Personally, I really connect with cumming inside her. At that moment, I can go as deep as I can and just go for it. At the same time, she's surrounding me with the warmth of her vagina (even through a condom) which just adds to the intensity. When I have been in a long-term relationship where we have gotten to the point of bareback sex, my partners have said that there is a sensation of the cum being shot into them that gets them off. A close second is to cum in her mouth. It feels almost like cumming in her vagina -- the wetness and the warmth. I have never pulled out at the last minute just so I could rip off the condom and cum all over her face. I'm still trying to figure out what's sexy about that for either of us.
So I was watching a new scene online the other day and enjoying, but then the guy pulls out and pops on her tummy. In my opinion, so anticlimactic! Ha! So I guess its a pretty open question to both the guys and gals.... If either in real life/hobby or in the porn you watch, where do you prefer to pop or to be popped on/in? Mouth, face, ass, pussy, tits, tummy, back, toes, whatever. Where does it gotta be?
I'm for the girl taking it all in. It can come out, no prob. If not in, then close. Otherwise, I might as well have just put it on her knee or on the headboard. Apologies to the knee fetishists out there.
I may be all wrong about this and, as a consequence, be ripped a new one in the subsequent posts. Since I am a risk-taker, I will post my opinion anyway and suffer the consequences.
I think the external cumshot anywhere on a woman's body is a contrivance of the porn industry. I don't know if its purpose is to demonstrate that the actors really had sex or that the it was real enough for the guy to have an orgasm. Since an actress can fake an orgasm, I guess the external cumshot is a way for porn producers to convince their viewers that it was "real."
Personally, I really connect with cumming inside her. At that moment, I can go as deep as I can and just go for it. At the same time, she's surrounding me with the warmth of her vagina (even through a condom) which just adds to the intensity. When I have been in a long-term relationship where we have gotten to the point of bareback sex, my partners have said that there is a sensation of the cum being shot into them that gets them off.
A close second is to cum in her mouth. It feels almost like cumming in her vagina -- the wetness and the warmth.
I have never pulled out at the last minute just so I could rip off the condom and cum all over her face. I'm still trying to figure out what's sexy about that for either of us.
95% of my finishes have been in the cover. When it's a good session I just can't stop midstream. But those times when CIM was offered I made a special effort--as Chris Rock said there's just something about coming in a woman's mouth God help me. Finished on a lady's breasts a few times but it always seemed a poor replica of porn scenes. One facial and it just seemed weird mostly because the lady who offered it rushed to get it off her so fast you'd think I'd thrown mud on her face.
All in all I probably prefer to send my seamen into a tidy receptacle while enjoying DFK with the lady of my choice as the moment of rapture arrives.
I prefer IN. Orifice no preference.