"Anyone who is in the public eye, whether it is a provider or a porn queen is open to gab...... YES... we do have the right and FREEDOM to talk about them and there is absolutely nothing wrong with this thread inquiry..."
I guess this is where I disagree with you. My feeling is that you can talk all you want about her films, pictures, past escorting experiences if there were any, but now that this person has left the business, transitioned back to a man, got married and has started a family, then I think HIS privacy should be respected.
I think the fact that you want to see pictures of HIM and his family now, and intrude on HIS personal and private life shows bad form.
I know you disagree with this, but this is my opinion and I am entitled to it.
Can anyone prove or disprove the rumor that Lisa Lawyer has reversed her appearance and has gone back to being a man?
There is a forum section on this subject on sf redbook.
Here is a link to it.
If the link works,thanks Antonella
I know. I posted on that forum. The problem is that one can never trust what you read on a forum. What I was hoping for was someone who had access to a Brazilian site that had some information. Afterall she is from Brazil.
Who cares? What difference does it make?
There are a million other girls out there. Move on.
This has nothing to do with dating her but rather how reliable is what you hear on message boards? If someone makes a statement about the status of a provider, they had better have the means to prove it. That is all I was asking. Can anyone verify that Lisa has reversed her operations?
The problem is, you want information about something that is private and personal to that individual.
How reliable is any message board? Who knows? But if every message board says the same thing, (and they do about her) I guess that's the best info you are going to get unless you want to personally go down to Brazil and ask him/her yourself.
If it's not true, I'm sure that info would have come out via new pics, new movies, etc.
Time to move on and get over it.
This is a review site Star. That's what we do - talk about providers and share info. I think it was a fair question and if I knew the answer I would certainly tell him.
First of all, I don't know if Lisa Lawyer was ever a "provider". I thought she only did porn. I'm not sure about that, however.
Second, Larry has all the info that anyone knows about. He just doesn't like the answer he hears so he keeps asking on different boards hoping to get a different answer.
Third, where do you draw the line? Is there ANYTHING that is off limits to talk about with these girls? Even when they leave the biz? How far do you go into their personal lives? Talk about her films all you want, but I think if someone leaves the business, then what they do after that, in their private lives, should be respected.
Anyone who is in the public eye, whether it is a provider or a porn queen is open to gab...... YES... we do have the right and FREEDOM to talk about them and there is absolutely nothing wrong with this thread inquiry...
Personally I don't care how many boards he posts the thread on... I'm glad he thought to include it here. I would not have known... Thanks for the juice larrygochanour. 
Interesting story..
"Anyone who is in the public eye, whether it is a provider or a porn queen is open to gab...... YES... we do have the right and FREEDOM to talk about them and there is absolutely nothing wrong with this thread inquiry..."
I guess this is where I disagree with you. My feeling is that you can talk all you want about her films, pictures, past escorting experiences if there were any, but now that this person has left the business, transitioned back to a man, got married and has started a family, then I think HIS privacy should be respected.
I think the fact that you want to see pictures of HIM and his family now, and intrude on HIS personal and private life shows bad form.
I know you disagree with this, but this is my opinion and I am entitled to it.
Yes you are entitled to your opinion - - - just as Larry was entitled to his before you tried to stifle him.
"Yes you are entitled to your opinion - - - just as Larry was entitled to his before you tried to stifle him."
The difference is, Larry was asking for personal information, he was not giving his opinion. Go back and re-read.
My advice to him was to move on. I think that's still good advice. At no time did I ever try to stifle him.
Are we done with this now?