To quote the review standards.."Remember, your opinion matters!"

Beverly Fisher given my handle.  Objectivity is often a chimera.  Lots of differing view points are the best way of achieving objectivity.

WHAT DOES THAT MEAN?
If you speculate on something about the provider that we cannot verify, such as she seemed to be high on drugs, was drunk, diseased, or some other supposition, your review will be rejected on that basis. Your review will also be turned down for using foul language. Even if you have been ripped off, please try to keep the tone of your review at a mature, fair level.

I posted once a very interesting anecdote invloving bebedoll... not a review, just a funny story..  I believe it was rejected only because I used the alias 'BeBeDolls Man Slut'.  However I never actuallty inquired.

who convinced me to fly from LA to Philly just to see her.  The weekend was so incredible, not only did I feel it was not a service, it was a once-in-a-lifetime experience.  Obviously, my response was to give her a 10.  My review was rejected initially for the same reason.  It was unbelievable because it was so unbelievable!!  After a few negotiations with the staff, they agreed to accept the review with a 9 rating.  Yes, the review was "not objective" to the reader because things like this don't often happen but once in a lifetime.

Bear in mind, all reviews are works of fiction anyway, so take it with a grain of salt.  

-- Modified on 1/28/2006 8:37:38 AM

...because it was "inconsistent" with other reviews.  Now, I have like 26 reviews, have seen DOZENS of gals I have not reviewed for various reasons, and yet my review was rejected because it differed from somebody else.  What does staff think, I decided to lie this time?  Absurd, but there you are...  MA

ford1970 was my client and he was never a hobbyist before. He did an objective review with graphic details and his was approved. You have to use less adjectives and praise and specificly state what the girl did

...and any other identifying features- this may help from feedback on the board.  (I hope STAFF doesn't find this objectionable).

I poste da review that wqas rejected for not being objective. I said things like "She has really great boobs" and "She is even more  beautiful than her pictures." They accepted the same review when I limited my review to a blow by blow description of the session with no adjectives. That doesn't make sense to me -- I would rather read the writer's impressions of the whole experience.

When a review of a provider reads more like a commercial for (or against) the provider, we flag it as not objective. I realize you had a great time, but a review is supposed to be impartial.  Just the facts.

...TER downgrades ratings.  I had a review downgraded from a 9 to an 8.  It appears there might be one acronym missing BUT based on my OTHER reviews, the missing acronym is on my menu.  The unfortunate thing is that I asked TER about it and did not receive a response.  I just think the hobbyist should be informed if their review is going to be downgraded by TER...newer hobbyists sometimes do not like to be so graphic and, as a result, do not realize their review will be altered.  

So, is the "contact us" link just for hobbyists..????    

...were denied for being obvious excerpts from  Charles Dickens novels. Who would guessed that so many of the review reviewers were English Lit majors.