She had a right to tell the guy "NO" but she chose to take the money and then to voice her "disgust" is the height of hypocracy. Unfortunately, there are many providers that think we are creeps and losers, but do your bidding for money and then complain. I am not into the real kink, but I resepect people who are willing to pay for what they want and if a provider does it, she should her heart into or not do it. My .02

Re:What was the weird fetish ??? I noticed you liked a pregnant provider in work boots..........

She was Pregnant? Holy moley! I just thought whe was big. LOL Yeah, maybe that does count as a fetish. Guilty as charged.

Let's face it. She might suffer backlash and I'd hate to have that on my head for causing it. My appologies to all for lack of detail. I had hoped that the subject topic alone would be sufficient.

But for arguments sake. Let's hypothetically say the guy was into golden showers or maybe scat. What would you say if a provider negatively commented on that?

Well you more or less prove my point....

I generally ignore such posts but I do so love a good debate. So here goes.

Your personal attack here is precisely the reason I won't post the lady's identity. I didn’t want to make this a topic to flame the lady. I see her being guilty of indiscretion not deserving of public outrage. I brought the original topic up for discussion. This is a discussion board right? I do not see how this constitutes bragging.

The original comment by Jack Shack on my attraction to a pregnant lady was posted with a indicating he was ribbing me. Of course I took that in stride. I did not take it as being "exposed" as you put it but merely I guess I didn't consider it a fetish as much as more a curiosity. But call it what you will, I can’t be offended either way.

So calling me names like wimp and saying that I'm hiding. Well, that’s all very childish but I guess I should not expect a criminal defense lawyer to behave in a civil manner. However, you will not be able to provoke me through name calling or any other manner in revealing her BLOG. It just that simple. You being a “criminal defense lawyer” as you posted elsewhere on this board, surely you must be able to understand the ethical dilemma despite the fact that your craft required you to ditch your ethics years ago when you entered your field.

As far as not showing respect to the group goes. I’d like to know what others think. Should I sacrifice this lady to the likes of people like you?  I don’t believe that would be doing the right thing. Had you made an argument on that point of why I should, maybe I would have considered it. But instead you took the path of a personal attack and that simply convinced me that I did the right thing.

Ladies, Hobbyists, do I cave to this sort of flame? Should I give up her name? Let's open that topic up for discussion. What do you all think?

PS: Since you seam to enjoy personal attacks. I’ll leave all with a some humor.

What do you call 200 lawyers at the bottom of a pond? …… A good start. ROFL

-- Modified on 8/20/2005 5:01:39 AM

...here are a few of the juicy entries.

May 1st
Nobody called.

May 2nd
No calls.

May 3rd
Phone's not ringing. It must be broken. I think I'll call Verizon.

May 4th
Verizon said the phone line is fine, but the phone is still not ringing.

May 5th
I finally got a call today, but it was a telemarketer wanting to know if I'd by a time share. I said "no", but then asked if she wanted to have sex. She hung up on me.