Newbie - FAQ

Minimum of 6-8 with most from guys with a similar number of reviews. If a . . .
keystonekid 114 Reviews 298 reads
posted

provider has less reviews and they are mostly from guys with only one review I will pass. As others have said, there should be some recent reviews as well. I will not see a lady whose reviews date back over a year with nothing current.

How many reviews make a "Well reviewed provider"??  Your thoughts...

Imo, the advice for this board, the gal needs not only to be "well reviewed" but "often reviewed" as well.

Generally, I would say pages of reviews, with many of the reviewers having a long list of reviews themselves, is a good start and a gal that has been in the business for a few years.  

White lists are also beneficial but many guys choose not to show their white list so its not a deal breaker.

and they would have to be satisfactory reviews on top of that

TwoMints360 reads

In most cases. I'll risk less if I know some of the other reviewers. I'm more flexible if some of the reviewer where written by guys with pages of reviews.

GaGambler370 reads

I would say for a woman to be "well reviewed" at least ten, with many of those reviews being from established reviewers.

Now if the question is "how many is enough for me?" Even one review by an established reviewer answers all the questions I need to know. Those questions being, is she legit? Are her pics real and accurate? What are her menu options regarding things like DKF, and BBBJ? and is her attitude decent?

Many guys here require detailed blow by blow reviews from multiple guys before deciding if a woman is right for them. I rarely even read the "Juicy details" and at most skim a couple of them for a general idea about the reviewers experience, not to drool over the 37 orgasms he gave her in a fifteen minute session.

If even one reviewer who is established can confirm those things to me, and gives her a generally positive review, that's good enough for me as long as I like her look.  The rest of it I can find out for myself once I get there.

on this thread, but I have my own opinion. To me well reviewed would mean at least half a dozen, and half the reviews should be from reviewers with at least half a dozen reviews themselves. The second part of that is the more important one (reviews from experienced reviewers) For example I would give more credence to a gal with only 5 reviews but all of them recent and all from guys with multiple reviews, than a girl with 30 reviews and all from 1st time reviewers.

IMHO, some of them need to be recent, actually, most of them.  I would like her to have close to 10.  You should also check the reviewers, they should have at least 5-10 each.  Be wary of guys with only 1 review.

LLAP,
Swim

provider has less reviews and they are mostly from guys with only one review I will pass. As others have said, there should be some recent reviews as well. I will not see a lady whose reviews date back over a year with nothing current.

I've seen providers with NO reviews who were recommended by provider friends, reviewers I know well and trust, etc... In those cases I have no problem being a first or second reviewer for a gal. Confidence in the source of the referral trumps any number of reviews for me, in those situations.

A few (2 or 3?) recent good reviews by well-known reviewers and a quick PM confirmation from one or two of them is enough for me to feel OK calling a gal. Again, confidence in the source of the information.

For most, I'd suggest that 5-10 good reviews with at least 1 review in the past 2-3 months and several written by guys with 10 or more reviews is a safe bet.... a lady who is both "Highly Reviewed" and "Well Enough Reviewed".

Of course, some gals are so well established and have reputations such that more and more reviews are basically meaningless.

I agree with GaGambler completely. You only need one review of the right kind to tell you all you need to know. In my area there is one guy who shares my taste in providers and seems to relish being the first to review, so basically I've been following his reviews and just seeing girls that he's seen and it's worked out well for me, especially since I see them before their quality is well known and they start raising prices.  He has no idea who I am but I probably know more about his sexual inclinations than his SO does if he has one. That sounds really creepy but whatever

It depends on how recent the reviews are and who reviewed them.  If the only reviews they have are from people that only have 1 review.  The reviews do not carry much if any weight.  It will also depend on what the reviews say.

I am that much more comfortable when I see that my new friends have reviewed well-established ladies!  

Being relatively new, IMHO, I think both parties should consider the reviewers and their teens.

 I've practiced this and have found that he and I were either great or - perhaps - better off in cancelling.

Thank you for the post!!

Krist

In my estimation, "well reviewed" means at least 5 or more reviews.  But more than that, I want to see 75% or the reviews be positive.  Even if a girl only has 4 reviews, I might see her if 3 out of 4 guys would repeat or gave positive experiences.  I can honestly say that I have only been disappointed a couple of times in the last decade.  

I have two simple rules: 1) I will not see a girl that is not reviewed, and 2) No matter how many reviews, most of them need to be positive for me to take a chance

Register Now!