Why does Sin City Soiree have it's own profile? Why are they listed in the Top 100 providers?
Profiles are for single providers or duos with a small amount for multiple girls (I know of one profile for 8 girls), but each review under a profile are for those SAME 1, 2, or more providers.
There are 5 providers; Suzy, Sara, Tricia, Shelli, and Barbie. They each have their own singles profile. Then there's a doubles profile for Suzy and Shelli, another one for Suzy and Barbie, and one for Suzy and Sara. Then there is another doubles profile for Shelli and Barbie and one for Tricia and Barbie, and a triple profile for Suzy, Shelli, and Tricia. Now a brand new review for Suzy, Shelli, and Barbie will not go under the Suzy and Barbie profile, or the Shelli and Barbie profile, nor will it go under the Suzy, Shelli, and Tricia profile. It will create another new profile. Since SSS does not use the same exact girls at every event, why is it that their events fall under one single profile? Shouldn't there be an individual profile for each separate group of providers? Another point: since their events also include multiple clients, is each client allowed to write a separate review of the same event? I understand each client could have a unique experience at the same event but in a simple MFM session is each client allowed to write a separate review of the same session?
So what if they don't fit the "single provider stereotype"?
They are unique, although there were other attempts (Boston board a few years ago, for instance) they all were short lived.
What's with all the whining? Got out of bed on the wrong side this morning?
😉
-- Modified on 3/27/2017 8:27:08 PM
I am just a "rules" guy and they do not fit under the TER rules.
makes for good reading..
Profiles are for single providers or duos with a small amount for multiple girls (I know of one profile for 8 girls), but each review under a profile are for those SAME 1, 2, or more providers.
Here's a hypothetical example:
There are 5 providers; Suzy, Sara, Tricia, Shelli, and Barbie. They each have their own singles profile. Then there's a doubles profile for Suzy and Shelli, another one for Suzy and Barbie, and one for Suzy and Sara. Then there is another doubles profile for Shelli and Barbie and one for Tricia and Barbie, and a triple profile for Suzy, Shelli, and Tricia. Now a brand new review for Suzy, Shelli, and Barbie will not go under the Suzy and Barbie profile, or the Shelli and Barbie profile, nor will it go under the Suzy, Shelli, and Tricia profile. It will create another new profile.
Since SSS does not use the same exact girls at every event, why is it that their events fall under one single profile? Shouldn't there be an individual profile for each separate group of providers?
Another point: since their events also include multiple clients, is each client allowed to write a separate review of the same event? I understand each client could have a unique experience at the same event but in a simple MFM session is each client allowed to write a separate review of the same session?
As all of the ladies have individual reviews too.
I am sure you can make a multiple review or individual ones for the ladies you enjoyed spending time with. I am happy to organize these kind of events with some planning in D.C. And Philly area and of course could consider traveling. Spring fever!
Re-read my post. Of course there can be reviews and profiles for multiple ladies, but how can different sets of multiple ladies end up on the same profile?