Thanks, some good ideas.
I notice there is a field in the agency profile called "other cities serviced". Seems like an easy solution on TERs side would be to add that field to the agency search.One thing that would make it a bit easier. When searching reviews, the sort by always defaults to last updated. The agency search is alphabetical. I don't see a way to change that sort. If you could, and you decided you weren't going to bother with agencies that haven't had a woman reviewed in 18 months, two years, whatever; it would probably shave a few pages off.
I've found myself using agencies more often. Thing is the agencies I've been using aren't located in my state.
I don't see a way to narrow the agency search down to distant agencies that tour my state, but with 22 pages of agencies any way to narrow things down would be good. One fix would entail a search for agencies that have models reviewed in my state. Another less specific fix might be a distinction between a local agency and an agency that tours in search parameters which would at least allow me to exclude agencies that will likely never have models available in my area.
Not sure this is something there would be interest in implementing but I thought I would mention it.
Big Blue Reviews tab. Then
[New Reviews] [Search Reviews] [Search v] (v is a dropdown menu)
Search v dropdown to Search Agencies
Add delimiters, such as your city.
A lot of agencies aren't listed; a lot of defunct agenceis are listed.
Do you know the phone number or email of your fave agencies?
Using regular "search reviews," enter the phone number but limit the search to your city.
If a review was posted using your city as the location (even if it doesn't show up in the visible Profile), it should show up in the hit list.
Likewise, using an email address.
I guess you could ask the agencies you use to email or text you when someone will be touring in your area.
I don't see a way to narrow the agency search down to distant agencies that tour my state, but with 22 pages of agencies any way to narrow things down would be good. One fix would entail a search for agencies that have models reviewed in my state. Another less specific fix might be a distinction between a local agency and an agency that tours in search parameters which would at least allow me to exclude agencies that will likely never have models available in my area.
Not sure this is something there would be interest in implementing but I thought I would mention it.
Thanks for the reply. The issue is that I'm looking for agencies that tour in my area but not based in my area, so the agency search can't narrow that down.
I don't have any issues with the agencies I'm already using. I'm just looking for other agencies I haven't used before. I found the agencies I use through Eros visiting ads, was hoping there was an easy way to search for others here at TER but if there's no way to narrow it down by areas visited then I'll have to comb through all 22 pages if I want to determine which tour and whether they tour my area.
Yeah I can see where that would get tricky. Maybe post this in ISO, name your city, and let them come to you?
One thing that would make it a bit easier. When searching reviews, the sort by always defaults to last updated. The agency search is alphabetical. I don't see a way to change that sort. If you could, and you decided you weren't going to bother with agencies that haven't had a woman reviewed in 18 months, two years, whatever; it would probably shave a few pages off.
Thanks, some good ideas.
I notice there is a field in the agency profile called "other cities serviced". Seems like an easy solution on TERs side would be to add that field to the agency search.
One thing that would make it a bit easier. When searching reviews, the sort by always defaults to last updated. The agency search is alphabetical. I don't see a way to change that sort. If you could, and you decided you weren't going to bother with agencies that haven't had a woman reviewed in 18 months, two years, whatever; it would probably shave a few pages off.