very interesting most professions you must have crudentials before you can title your self

there's a saying about hot young rising starlets on their way up the porn ladder of fame who blossom into mega-star porn "celebrities" (who eventually end up costing us "poor" hobbyists our goddamn mortgages!

which must've been coined by amateur porn-King directors/actors ... "we get them on their way UP and also on their way DOWN" !

meaning (perhaps) that in the bizarre parallel porn-universe of Hollywood, somewhere an aging "faded" porno-Queen can be heard uttering these words:

"I'm ready for my anal gangbang, Mr. Powers"

(that's only funny if you've seen "Sunset Boulevard"

--

now ... if only i could get rid of these pop-ups on cumfiesta.com !  LOL

and guys ... don't tell me that you DIDN'T check out that site (was first time for me)... but hey!  i spotted a hot little Brit import on there that i wouldn't mind "forking", Ashley Long ... better get her now while she's cheap. this girl may be going places!  LOL

-- Modified on 8/4/2003 1:47:39 PM

Marketing is right, I checked Rebecca's web site, and found this rather lengthy review of her web site. I didn't post a link, because I believe the new posting rules prohibit that. Rebecca does look great, super little spinner body, but your point is well taken FE, a year or so in the "porn biz" and the rates get jacked up to high heaven.........

it seems like there are only two kinds of ladies who really make it in porn, and then can command the high dollars, really attractive ladies, like Jenna J who are super stars, and then attractive ladies, who light up not only the screen, but their reviews as well. All the rest just fall somewhere in the forgettable middle.

Rebecca is cute and sexxy looking enough, and I haven't seen any of her "work", but my guess is, she'll either start doing the really nasty stuff, and maybe end up on the dance circuit, or as one of EX 2000's or BM's over priced-over, over hyped starlets who don't get many requests for escort services. Tough to command 1500 per when you have seen so many clients at much cheaper rates, regardless of how good the reviews were..........here's the review of her web site:


Fanatics of Rebecca Luv’s XXX video performances should be advised at the outset that I’m not a longtime fan, and although I come to this site having seen a few of Rebecca’s vids, I don’t have her filmography, measurements or favorite sexual positions at the tip of my tongue.   This is a good thing, I suppose, as single porn star websites seem to glory in that kind of detail, giving the member a chance to learn something about the off-screen persona of his favorite fuck goddesses while delving into the archives for unseen footage and stills.


With this criteria in mind—that the site reveal something about the featured star while offering up sizable film and video galleries devoted, in this case, to Rebecca Luv—I take a cruise around the site.  The design work is simple and lacks whistles and bells, but the navigation is easy, and I don’t waste time with dead links or confusing graphic details trying to get a feel for what’s here.  Several popups complicate the initial visit and enrollment—one with some really choice general MIDI web music, hehe—but after ponying up the $20 for a 30 day membership, I’m quickly logged in and given the all-access pass.



Poking around here, one of the most obvious early observations is that the content at rebeccaluv.com is predominantly pics.  A XXX webcam in Rebecca’s computer room offers 24 hr. coverage, but I seemed not to be able to catch the site’s star (or her roommates) online.  Archived webcam sessions feature Rebecca with body paint, shaving, and playing with a large dildo while wearing a white wig, but both the low- and high-res streaming .wmv files in the “webcam archives” streamed at 95Kb/s, looking decent in miniature buut considerably worse as I approached a comfortable screen size.   The performances in these exclusive vids are decent and give an up-close-and-personal feel, though without sound or the option to download, and streaming at a relatively low bandwidth, they’re neither highly collectible nor state-of-the-art.

As I say, however, the real heart of Rebecca Luv’s site lies in the photo galleries.  Here you’ll find nearly 40 shoots of Rebecca hard at work.  The shoots are culled from her video work for Vivid and other big name XXX production companies, as well as from her appearances at porn industry parties and conventions.  There’s a lot here—the galleries ranging in size from 15 to more than 100 photos—and the pics are of decent quality, ranging from about 25K to 80K per image.  While the site also features a “girl of the month” gallery featuring exclusive (though fairly short) pictorials of such stars as Savanna and Olivia del Rio, many of the lesser known “girls of the month” seem actually to benefit from the occasionally poor picture quality--25K for a color .jpg photo always seems bit on the pixelized side of things for my tastes.



To repeat, though, it’s not about the “other girls” here anymore than it’s about the goofy radio pranks and flash movies featured in the “best of archives” (seemingly licensed from HumorCentral.net).  What this site is about, plain and simple, is celebrating the talent and character of Rebecca Luv, a task aided nicely by the inclusion of both a “diary” and “get personal” page.  Here, Rebecca reports on her latest industry schmooz-fests and sexual trysts, presenting a very modest portrait of herself along the way.  I don’t mean that there’s anything modest about her appearance—she refers to herself as “short, petite and small” at 5’3”, 115 lbs and comments that she’s often told that she’s “built like a brick shit house”—but simply that she seems to be fairly humble sincere about herself and her career.  For me anyway, this is a refreshing change from the usual bragging and blather that fills the average porn site’s “about me” page.



In the end. . .



           Rebeccaluv.com is a respectably constructed and served site devoted to the XXX escapades of its eponymous star.  While the 40 or so photo galleries of Luv constitute the bulk of the what the site’s got to offer, the diary, Q&A, web-cam, and multicity-hosted chat features guarantee that you’ll feel closer to Rebecca after dropping $20 for a month’s membership than you did before.  As I’ve already mentioned, however, there’s not a lot of “bonus” material here to fill out the site, and, personally, I’m left feeling no more a Rebecca Luv groupie than I was before signing on.  Leaving aside the relative lack of good (downloadable) videos and the occasionally substandard photo resolution, I’m happy to recommend this site on, though primarily to those who are already acquainted with Luv’s work and have little reservation about identifying themselves as fans.  



2003-05-24









-- Modified on 8/4/2003 8:41:19 PM

The problem is that it is a "WE THE PEOPLE", and if someone chooses to select "yes" when asked PORN ACTRESS? nothing much can be done about it... I don't think it's feasible to expect TER to cross check every girl's credentials on a database to verify.

Again, IMHO this is really much ado about nothing... The true Porn Hobbyists KNOW who is and who isn't a bona fide pornstar, so when you see a name that isn't, just ignore it.

What I find more annoying on the PS database is that for whatever reason, a pornstar can have two or three seperate listings  scattered randomly with reviews from different guys, so you have to page through the entire database to make sure you've seen ALL of the reviews... I'd much rather see TER make the effort to consolidate all the reveiws so that a girl is listed only once with a complete collection of the reviews.  

And while we're on the subject, another thing I'd like to see is an occasionally update the details section... a girl can have twenty reviews, and 19 of them say she provides BBBJ,  but her detail section is based strictly by the remarks of the first guy who posted a review, so if he got a CBJ that's how she's rated.

IMHO, these things are more important than whether a girl is a true pornstar or not in determining her level of service.

what a "co-inky-dink" !

just tonight on Kilborn there was a little funny sketch (an exchange between Craig and Gibby) over the distinction between porn STAR and porn ACTRESS ... what are the odds?  LOL

according to Gibby: "they're ALL stars to me!"

Candy, you DO meet my definition of a pornstar... You have an established body of work, not all gonzo, you've done magazines, etc., and more importantly, you've got that smokin' hot pornstar persona!

What a girl charges is what a girl charges.... it's her right to determine what she feels her time and efforts are worth, and I don't think anyone would argue with that.  What I meant by marketing is that often a girl will use the term "pornstar" to justify what she charges, regardless of her credentials.

frankly my dear ...

"Expert panelists, where do I stand in your opinion, given testimony and evidence already submitted, and precidents already clearly defined in this thread?" -- Nikki "Prime USDA Certified PSE Nookie" Diamond


you had me at "anal beds" .... that's right, anal beads! ... that right there should qualify you, PERIOD!  



-- Modified on 8/12/2003 5:20:56 PM