has no say-so about being outed in this way. Perhaps it should be a profile item where only the girl can say whether or not it's on the menu, and reviewers' only option would be "don't know." I think most girls regard being outed in a review as a huge breach of trust, but in the case of Kgirls, they are not members, so they can't object or try to correct the record. That's why many top girls leave LA and go to other cities.
From discussions on other boards, we learned that often these were fake bragging or worse, retaliation against a provider who denied such requests. On the menu, only BBBJ is approved item any way.
Even if in some instances that a provider allows that, it should be private matter between the two.
I think it was a good change to allow it to be mentioned. Anyone who pretends it doesn't happen is a fool, and openly mentioning it is better than pretending it doesn't happen. Those who seek it out can find like minded individuals. Those who avoid it can know who to avoid.
has no say-so about being outed in this way. Perhaps it should be a profile item where only the girl can say whether or not it's on the menu, and reviewers' only option would be "don't know." I think most girls regard being outed in a review as a huge breach of trust, but in the case of Kgirls, they are not members, so they can't object or try to correct the record. That's why many top girls leave LA and go to other cities.
... cases where the BBFS etc never happened, but it's a "revenge" review or some guy living in Dreamland. And when that happens and there's evidence the session actually happened but no evidence the BBFS didn't happen (eg an email or PM from the reviewer that threatens the provider), then it's "he said vs. she said" and from what I've seen, TER will let the review stand... with negative consequences for the provider. I know of cases where a provider delisted rather than have a review say she does BBFS when she never does that with clients.
Perhaps that's why no mention of BBFS or BB Greek was allowed until the last few years. That might be the only way to prevent this kind of false review, with the downside that was already mentioned.