That sucks. Hopefully Kim will make some accomodation for you, which I do not think is likely. Her reviews will precede her and gents will have you and the other two gents to thanks for their candor.
Approved. Did anyone else see her while she was in DC??? Anyone?
Read these two reviews as well:
http://theeroticreview.com/reviews/ShowReview.asp?Review=258682&user=291600
http://theeroticreview.com/reviews/ShowReview.asp?Review=238933&user=291600
-- Modified on 12/9/2004 8:01:59 PM
That sucks. Hopefully Kim will make some accomodation for you, which I do not think is likely. Her reviews will precede her and gents will have you and the other two gents to thanks for their candor.
Her reviews for the past couple of months have not been good. $$$1/2. agree is way to high..performance has been low.. Thanks for the honesty..
It never ceases to amaze me, you read these reviews and guys say this wasn't good, that wasn't good, I wouldn't see her again and then give the provider an 8?
That doesn't help us out one bit. I'm gonna pay less attention to the number and actually READ ALL the reviews very carfully.
Guys -I saw Bridgette a couple of years ago when she first came to DC. Had an awesome time with her -and thought, as the others did, that the woman was a stunning woman, with incredible breasts.
Have not had a chance to see her recently, but would definitely return again -if we are ever in the same city at the same time (can't seem to make that happen these days).
Rick2
Sure JT, that's how TER sells VIP memberships. If the numbers really MEANT anything, a fair chunk of current members probably wouldn't BE. BTW, it works the other way around too, when TER can lower scores without giving any explanation, and the reviewer has NO recourse. The reviewer can't even request that the review be pulled (to the best of my knowledge only a provider can request that all of their OWN reviews be pulled). I had one review lowered two points! What is intuitively the difference between a 7 and a 9 to you? Quite a BIT, to me. Net result? It ends up offending someone you NEVER meant to. People think the reviewer gave that score, when perhaps they did not.
Ponzone and JT - agree 100%. Sometimes just shake my head at some of the ratings. How about the guy that is a victim of bait and switch, decides to stay even though the girl is not that hot, has to pay extra for what he thought he was getting with the original donation, the girl does not kiss or give a bj and he then gives her a 7 or 8 for performance. Then there is the guy who is with a hot girl that does the whole alphabet, goes over the hour and basically rocks his word. Her performance rating is knocked from a 9 to an 8, for reasons unknown. If you do not read the review you can waste a lot of money on that first lady.
Was recently checking reviews on a certain lady. Mostly mediocre, but with one 10 10. Checked that guys other reviews, he had 8 and all were 9's and 10's (with 6 10's in each category). Some of the ladies he was giving 10's to could have made the cut for The Swan series, not really the help we need.
What confounds me is why TER changes scores in the first place.. Maybe the lady had an exceptional day, or the guy she was seeing was totally thrilled with her and felt she deemed a high score. How does it become TER's job to edit something they know nothing about? They weren't in the room, they don't know if she had a really good hair day and looked 10 smokin or just really clicked with a guy and gave an exceptional experience..
TER people sit in an office somewhere, reading reviews all day and somehow arbitrarily decide a score is too high or low, based on past performance?? How is that fair?? Maybe she's not normally a CIM girl, but on that particular day, she liked the guy a lot and did it anyway. I've had girls do things they claim they won't do, because we just clicked..
There is this sense of domination TER puts us all through when they change things without any real reason to do so. It's not any difference than having to fill out an entire form that keeps the original answers, regardless if you write something else.. If she does CIM for me, but the original poster said NO in that question, it remains no forever, even if she aquired a 'taste' for it and started doing it regularly.. Our current answers are ignored.. Another of the issues with how TER creates reviews that are inaccurate.
And as Ponzie said, if the lady in question sees her low score, she may feel hurt if the guy said he had a great time and intended to give her a high score then she reads it and it's a 5-6..
I'd suggest many things to do it better, but TER has routinely ignored my emails, and apparently doesn't ever answer anyone's mail, and they continue to do things the way they feel like it..
I'd suggest a 'chart graph' instead of one blanket answer.. If 10 guys see someone, and she allowed CIM 5 times.. the graph could look like this:
Scores Oldest to newest:
111
210987654321
CIM? NNNNNYYYNNYY
instead of a blanket Yes.. The graph could be for the previous 10-20 reviews then the oldest drop off.. This would show that while she didn't do it before, she's more apt to do it now. It could also be dots Green for yes, Red for no.. etc etc..
Same with other issues and scores in the reviews.. But ultimately, TER really has no right to change the scores or reviews as unless they're actually the participant, they have no way to know how the reviewer felt.. In the case of ripoffs, and she gets a 10, then clearly it's a shill review and it's simply not accepted at all..
I keep saying I'd like to do a site similar to TER for local people, with truly certified photos and the more I read, the more i wonder if it's worth doing it better than what's currently out there..
--JB
-- Modified on 12/11/2004 7:52:18 AM
JB, I have addressed this subject numerous times on this board. However, not everyone gets to see them because a page can scroll off very quickly and many just won't go back even one page in their reading and responding (muchless two or three). Previously however, I have suggested that once TER changes a review, it effectively has become THEIRS. However, there is NO mechanism to show that or to display that the review was changed. Also, what you mentioned about the top portions of the review have been covered numerous times, as well. Nonetheless, you are RIGHT. Why must we keep filling it out, if nothing up there ever CHANGES? And, how misleading can that be, when things DO change in actuality?
First, appearance is such a subjective quality (the old "eye of the beholder" principal). What I, as an older guy, might find "endearing" in a lady's body might put off a young guy. (Hey, I grew up in an age when women had hair there, and didn't have "feminine hygiene" products.)
Performance is also subjective, to a point. I don't care about Greek, so it's not points for or against in my book. As for the sacrocanct BBBJCIM, one of the most intense experiences I've had in the recent past (my eyes rolled back in my head, my knees almost buckled) involved CBJ.
I, like others, also don't understand how a reviewer who apparently has all his desires met ends up giving a rating of 6.
Lleb
I've got one better than that guys. I saw Mari Lynn from BDJ while she was in Baltimore and when she opened the door I almost turned around . The pictures of her are at least 10-15 years old. She is definitly false advertising. Big stomach scar and old looking.
Iceblu