any correction done on that ad.  The ad remained the same 10 days after I posted the initial message in LA board.  The guy that first reviewed her in TER had responded to my post.  Many LA members have read it.  I think someone from Body Miracle probably have made known about it several days ago.

If I remembered correctly, Heather Scott was listed in Body Miracle's site for at least several months.  There was never any review of her in TER until a couple of weeks ago.  I think many members automatically assume that some one that good looking are probably not the real deal (the pictures are either several years old or the services are up to no good.).  Maybe the reason why BM placed that ad in Eros-LA under LW’s name is to generate traffic and inform hobbyists she is available.  

There are many other semi-famous ladies available in this hobby through restricted members-only access sites.  Their faces are either blurred or hidden behind secured sites.  Since she chose to use her real photos (which is widely available) in her ads, in some ways, she wanted to generate as much traffic as possible.  No one who chose to keep a low profile would use her full faced photos in an ad on a much visited ad mall like Eros especially in a media capital like Los Angeles.  There are literally thousands of visitors to Eros-LA daily compared to the merely few hundred members who read TER boards messages regularly.

LW has changed her career recently from Nude models in girlie magazines to porn star/starlet.  If you read BM’s Eros-LA ad about LW: http://www.eros-la.com/files/at-body1-laurie1.htm , it is like a resume of all her work up to now.  This is not some clerical mistake that accidentally use the wrong name in an ad.  Who knows, maybe she and BM decide to create a big splash in this hobby now that her career goal has changed.  With this ad in Eros, I guess their phones are now ringing off the hook.

I have in past tried hard to protect a lady’s identity when they chose not to review them.  I am not one of those who pinpointed Lucy’s identity even though her photos were blurred to protect her id.  I have alerted Staff about posts and reviews that identified a lady who was a Playmate.

I know there are many TER members who chose to exchange info through backchannels.  A large portion of them didn’t post reviews or inform other members of their findings.  Since they took the chance and spent their own money, it is their right to see fit how they depose those info.  I personally preferred to lay things out in TER boards or reviews.  I benefited from other members’ reviews and posts, so I choose to contribute back to the TER community through the same means.

I didn’t set out to dig up info about LW.  This was done in response to the skepticism expressed by a number of LA members about the truthfulness of the photos of Heather Scott and the validity of her TER review.  I was one of the skeptics who implicitly expressed my doubt.  Hence I felt the responsibility to clarify things when I found out the truth.

I am quite sure if BM, LW or other members filed a complaint to Staff, GND or the PS mod MichaelCA about my message, they will make the right decision about whether it should remain here or be deleted.  Whatever the decision is, I would gladly abide by it.

p.s. I don't like to rely on my words alone to thumb up or down on a lady.  Since I use an alias to post in TER boards and choose to remain obscure with my TER id, I prefer to gather relatively objective data and present them in a message for others to decide.

Eddie, I have great respect for what you do in this board and to other TER members.  I guess this is a case of me having a different POV than yours.

Take care and please continue your good work.


-- Modified on 7/7/2003 12:57:21 AM