I only hobby on a limited basis so I need to make the most of the opportunities. For me the age range is generally mid 30s to late 40s for the same reasons stated by Mr. Fisher. However, chemistry with the lady is really important, too, if I'm going to have a great time. So I do the best homework I can during my decision process. Thus far the ladies I've met have all been wonderful in terms of the total experience (attitude, personality, maturity and service) and I wouldn't change a thing.
I'm curious what other 60+ members think......would you prefer to be with a 20-something provider with a really hot, smokin' bod but possibly an attitude to go with it? Or do you enjoy being with women who are closer to your age but easier to relate to?
I find that when I can relate to my partner, the whole experience is more enjoyable. In the last couple of years if it isn't a combination of personality and a nice body, I can't orgasm from penetration and usually need a HJ to finish me off. And it's once and done now for me too....the first time usually takes so long a 2nd pop is out of the question.
Most recently I found a nice combination of age, attitude, looks and personality and it was the first itme in over a year that I O'd during penetration. Had it not been the end of a long week, I think I might have gone a 2nd round too....maybe next time I see her. But I'm convinved that I want the combination of personality and a body along with a nice unrushed session, or else it's just a more expensive way to get a HJ.
...I have found a few that provide what you describe but I do tend to go for a more mature provider. I agree that a combo of maturity, personality, attitude, and looks in an unrushed session is what I find most appealing.
-- Modified on 4/2/2013 10:14:56 PM
But with that said, I agree that more mature ladies are generally easier to relate to, plus most have a level of experience that makes a difference as well. My best times have been with mid 30's to mid 40's ladies, and I generally draw the line at 25 on the young side. I don't generally have a problem getting off, but I just enjoy the overall experience more with a lady is old enough to know herself, to understand me, and who still takes care of body.
That i enjoy the company of older (mid 30s - early 40s) women as they are indeed easier to relate to. The exception has been a mid 20s lady that I have seen on a repeat basis. She has all the attributes that you would want in a 20s provider, killer bod, enthusiasm and youthful charm, but in addition she is easy to relate to, so intellectually it feels we are on par.
So I have learned not to hold fast to pursuing the hobby on any preconceived basis as each lady is unique - and the fun is the delightful discovery that results
i see several ladies on a regular basis who are in their 40's..i find them all to be absolutely remarkable women..they..like us..enjoy sex immensely..they are never rushed..are a complete companion..and are a joy to be with..they always appreciate being with an older gentleman..the vibes we get are totally different than what they feel with a younger client..they want what we want..a relaxed intimacy with enjoyable and palpable mind blowing sex..
"they want what we want..a relaxed intimacy with enjoyable and palpable mind blowing sex.."
I'm in my 20's and I want that too :
I only hobby on a limited basis so I need to make the most of the opportunities. For me the age range is generally mid 30s to late 40s for the same reasons stated by Mr. Fisher. However, chemistry with the lady is really important, too, if I'm going to have a great time. So I do the best homework I can during my decision process. Thus far the ladies I've met have all been wonderful in terms of the total experience (attitude, personality, maturity and service) and I wouldn't change a thing.
There are a lot of moving parts in this question (at least for me).
I think women peak in sexual drive and appetite at 50 +/- 10 years or so -- anywhere from 40 to 60 with the high point on the bell curve being right at 50.
Then there is the old saw ( I think it is French ) that the ideal age relationship is "Half. Plus 7."
So for a 60 year old, it would be 37. Whereas for a 30 year old, 23. There's merit in this one.
When day trading has gone super well, there's always the solution of doing it all. A FMF 3-some of a 20 something and a 40 something. And when you collect the get out of jail free card and pass go and there's a special dividend -- a foursome. Three women -- 20/40/60 . . . That I haven't done yet.
Of course, I'd throww all of that away if I could ever find this:
A pair of identical twins, petite, blonde, 18 to 22 years old, all natural, greek friendly and pregnant. (All four pregnant much preferred, but will settle for only three.
I was with a 24 year old last night, first meeting, a relative newcomer with great photos and high reviews. She's attractive, fit, great bod, magnetic personality, friendly, intelligent and well spoken, delivered even beyond my expectations and made me pant just to look at her. So what's not to like? Nothing, really, and I will return, and yet...there is a considerable difference in our ages, which I was more distracted by than she was. As a result, I think the best for me are in shape 30-35 with the above qualities, and I strongly disagree with those who say such women are hard to find. The woods are full of them, and when they prowl I howl.
Sometimes worldliness, wisdom, and experience don't matter