describe transvestites in a very negative way... as opposed to transsexuals. Okay, I received some decent responses to my query about Post Ops, enough that I may just try one on for size (pun intended)... But, I have to wonder why so much negativism about the TVs... the basic difference that I see between TVs and TSs is that many TVs wear wigs (more than a few TSs wear wigs too, and not for fashion reasons) and they don't have implants... and probably aren't on hormones... not a bad thing at all! How many times have we felt cheated by a TS provider that had a nonfunctional cock or a less-than-functional cock? You don't find that problem with a TV. Is it a commitment thing? Are TVs demeaned because they haven't made the commitment to breasts? I have had a wonderful time with Chloe, and would love to visit Ariel sometime. I guess that some people don't like broccoli... some don't even like steak! This post is not intended to piss anyone off, but to promote discussion and the free sharing of ideas and information among the hobbyists... providers are welcome to chime in too!
The only derogatory thread I can recal regarding TV's revolve around the one provider who advertises as a TS.
Some poeple like Ford and some like GM, there is nothing anyone can do about it. Go ahead and piss someone off. What do you think weekends are for anyhow!!!!!
While I have never spoken bad about TV's I would definitely get mad and tell off one if he advertises as a TS which some do, Kayla Coxx comes to mind. I like my TS's very famine looking and there are quite a few that are feminine, to me having a nice breast size is part of the look and are functional.