Porn Stars

Re:I totally agree
Slanteater 6459 reads
posted


END OF MESSAGE

Slanteater10833 reads

Okay, I just had the pleasure of spending an hour with Audree Jaymes this afternoon and I have to say those are the most perfect breasts I have ever seen. But what stands out even more about my afternoon? That must be the fact that she doesn't give head... Nope. You heard me. Not CBJ nor BBJ... She claims it wasn't me, it's just not part of the package. You're a porno chick and you don't give head??? What's next, A Big Mac without the meat?  A Mercedes without leather interior? Bummer...

kelsp11794 reads

Did she give you CFS?, Multiple positions, Multiple pops?  How much did you pay?  How did you set it up?

Thanks,
Kevin

Slanteater8781 reads

She has an ad on cityvibe with her cell phone number or go to her website: audreejaymes.com... Multiple everything but BJ (YMMV),one pop for $$$ 1/2. She travels between LA and Vegas quite often. I'd post a full review, but staff continues to bar me from doing so.  Why you ask? Because they kept rejecting a review I wrote without telling me why. So, I kept making changes and resending it. This pissed them off. Go figure. When I eventually found out why the review was rejected, I understood their concern. I just needed to know that first. Stepping off my soap box now. Good luck.

kelsp10624 reads

Thanks for the 411 on Audree Jaymes.  I really appreciate it.

Kevin

Kevin,

Don't assume any one person's information is gospel. As is often said in this hobby, your mileage may vary. It is always up to the lady to set her personal limits and those limits often vary with her mood, the particular client she is seeing, or for a myriad of other reasons. I've seen Audree, and I posted a review of our encounter. But just because she offered (or denied) a particular activity to me in our session doesn't mean the next person (or even myself, on any subsequent visits) will necessarily receive any or all of the same services.

There may be a very good reason why Audree chose not to offer oral in the case of this poster, and it may or may not have anything to do with him personally. So please don't junp to any conclusions about this lovely lady (or any provider) simply because of one person's less than satisfactory experience.

Regards,
Speed Racer

kelsp8112 reads

Speed Racer,

Ok, I will keep all of that in consideration.  Thanks for the advice!

Take care,
Kevin

Ladies who advertise as porn stars, no matter what the rate they offer or command, should be held to a relatively high level of service. After all, you are paying for what is essentially a high concept fantasy. If the lady can't deliver her all, then she should advise the client properly before the $ changes hands.

Audree, darling, if you're tuning in, PSE and no BJ, methinks you've been spending too much time on the barstool lately.

Number 6,

I agree with what you're saying (except for the somewhat smug comment to Audree, though I believe you may not have intentionally been trying to insult her). But just because a lady is a porn star doesn't necessarily mean she always (or ever) delivers what most would consider to be a PSE. I'd agree that a BJ, either a BBBJ or a CBJ is a pretty basic activity, and not for just porn stars either. So if that is not to be on the agenda on any given occasion, I'd certainly agree that the lady should be very up-front about it at the beginning of the encounter (if not beforehand).

Regards,
Speed Racer


just teasing! :)  i understand what you're saying, but i just wanted to take this opportunity to clear something up (for those who care about nuances with this topic) ... you said:

"just because a lady is a porn star doesn't necessarily mean she always (or ever) delivers what most would consider to be a PSE" -- Speed Racer


this statement/expectation is automatically rendered FALSE, if the porn star in question advertises her services as being a  _P._S._E._  ... let's review that in detail: what you said does not apply if she sells herself and hence by implication her services as being a PSE (pornstar experience) session. if she doesn't plan on giving BJs or other PSE-like services it's perfectly fine to say she's a "porn star" to attract attention but then she should NOT, repeat NOT, use the descriptive and suggestive term of "PSE" in the advertisement or webpage (perhaps as a marketing gimmick)

afterall, we're not stupid (or insensitive!) and we can understand why some pornstars may offer their lovely company but may not wish to do certain things with (certain) clients. as long as the phrase PSE is not bandied about recklessly (and things are discussed upfront) this should not be a problem, and both parties are very likely to walk away happy!


now i guess to qualify i should also add the obligatory "IMHO" to this post (although quite frankly, i don't see much leeway on this point, so just for the heck of it, i won't! >:)



Singleton,

I certainly agree that if a porn star BILLS herself as a PSE, she should live up to that. All I was saying is that not all porn stars provide PSE. If circumstances dictate that a porn lady cannot provide a PSE as advertised, she shuld make that clear up-front, before the session begins.

Regards,
Speed Racer

So, where does advertising your filmography online puts you?

I really wasn't taking a swing at Audree, to be fair, I stay away from the younger ones because IMO they might not be mature enough to understand what it takes to be successful. I'm sure she's a sweet young lady.

props back...

Register Now!