No need to to get cheeky... I have written more problem reports than you have written reviews...
My point simple..... If TER is not going to use the data that we all are required to give at the begining of our reviews whats the point in giving it? We should not have to put in a problem report to change a providers profile options..... If I check that the BJ is un covered...then her profile should now reflect that....
In the last year I have slowed down my reviewing quite a bit, as I have bee seeing some of my local atfs on the regular. Lately every review I have posted has been challenged or unapproved . They are constantly wrong...most of the time I highly doubt they even took the time to READ the review. They quote me the TER guidelines for posting reviews. I think after 300 pus reviews I KNOW the guidelines. Its very frustrating and annoying. My latest review clearly states that we performed Greek and I get there BS about it only qualifying for a 7..... All the while I read newbie reviewers with 1 review to their name giving 10's on unrevirewed women. What the hell is going on?
I totally agree... while I don't have 300 reviews on this site I have been in the hobby over 20 years.. I pay for a VIP membership on this site and have submitted 5 reviews of which only one was approved... why not let paying members post their reviews if people don't like them they will ignore them... this having someone who was not actually in the room with the lady telling you what should be in your review is pure crap.
Paying to have a review published makes no sense.
We VIPs pay to get access to the reviews and a few other features. The decision to publish a review should have to do with the correctness of the review, and nothing more. It's not enough to say that some people can just ignore a review they don't like. The point is not whether or not one likes a review, the point is that TER members need to be able to trust a review in order to know whether or not the gal they see will be someone they want to see.
I agree that there are some strange rules and practices concerning which reviews go up and which do not, but just letting anyone who is VIP automatically get their review published would only make things much worse.
Just because you received Greek, does not necessarily mean she gets the extra point.
It must be on her profile that she offers Greek. Some providers choose to have 'Don't Know' or 'YMMV' as she does not offer it to everyone.
The previous six members who reviewed the provider did not get Greek, even though a few were interested.
Sorry with all due respect that simply bullshit....
the previous six members engaged in 30...and 15 minute bullshit quickie session.....
If you think the guy that spends 75-100 for a quikie session is going to get the same as one that paid the girl 300 and didn't mind tipping an extra hundred to get Greek .....then you don't understand the Hobby.
You state that my session may have been a case of YMMV.... You must not be a hobbyist because then you would know that EVERY option is a case of YMMV. If provider kisses....you think she going there if the guy has bad breath and smells like an ashtray.....
The whole "must be in her profile" is equally ridicules..... Her profile is only the information that the first reviewer submits.....you guys don't update it.....
I agree with christophtrac's comments 100%. The first reviewer establishes her profile and it seems to never change. If a YMMV session occurs and the provider performs a 10 in performance with the client then she should be able to receive a 10!!
...requirement of "extra" services being offered to qualify for a 10.
Regarding the profile never changing that is the fault of reviewers. Reviewers should file problem reports when they are aware of a needed update. Yes, it requires a little effort but present evidence and it will happen. I have done it often.
I do think the provider has some responsibility in this but when they don't do it then it's up to reviewers to file those reports.
am sorry that's wrong.... the site needs to update the profile as the reviews are posted. We give them all the data they need.... they choose to disregard that data and not update it.....If the first reviewer is a nasty slob who wants a 15 minute bust a quick nut session......The poor girl is doomed..... That jackass might bust his nut in 5 minutes ...and then go back and write a review saying that says he felt rushed...it was CBJ only no kissing no DATY ....no GFE...... giving her a 5 or 6..... I am sorry..... that's not fair for the provider.....
Now if the second reviewer has a "real" session an hr or more...and they connect. She is a true GFE session ....they get along great, she's easy to talk to, she's seductive, she puts him at ease and FUCKS his brains out!!! GFE in every way including BBBJ DFK,and GREEK and a host of other acronyms including multiple shots a t goal. According to TER she isn't eligible for a 9 or 10 because her PROFILE says she isn't eligible......
the system is flawed.....
No need to to get cheeky... I have written more problem reports than you have written reviews...
My point simple..... If TER is not going to use the data that we all are required to give at the begining of our reviews whats the point in giving it?
We should not have to put in a problem report to change a providers profile options.....
If I check that the BJ is un covered...then her profile should now reflect that....
...for every review (It really is a pain in the ass.) consider the ymmv factor. Imagine the lady generally doesn't do bbbj but from time to time she will. Having that profile item frequently changing would not be a good thing. The problem report requires some effort and evidence. The profile being changed by simply filling in the form differently does not.
Maybe my scenerio doesn't happen that often but it's a possibility.
I've often wondered what would happen if I filled the profile form of an established provider with whatever item was first choice on the drop down menus regardless of accuracy (since what I put won't change anything) and submitted my review. Would the review admin (or the software) even notice?
-- Modified on 5/21/2015 12:15:31 PM
...requirement for ratings above 7.
They could post percentages next to the services, like a poll.
Anal:
- yes - 85%
- ymmv - 10%
- no - 5%
Or how about hair length? I can imagine providers like to change their hair length from time to time like other people. Does that get updated with every review? Do they have to submit a problem report for that?
...if it's a complicated change they can use the Contact Us link. Nothing on the profile gets changed without a problem report or Contact Us submitted to TER admin.
When the next guy reviews her and leaves everything as an I don't know her profile would then be basically useless.
She can report her own profile and fix anything that needs fixing. It's her laziness that holds her scores down.
Anyone can report her profile for inaccurate information, including herself.
It isn't TERs fault. It is her fault.
I do agree that even though it is clear that she doesn't offer Greek to the vast majority... I don't see why she can't get a bump in her score based off what she did with you.... for your review only. My reasoning is flawed too because who is to say that you aren't saying she did something just for a higher score. Not saying that is the case by any means. I am speaking about a possibility TER could encounter if the scoring was based on individual reviews vs what she offers.
Apparently, according to the above post from TER, she doesn't offer greek but rarely. It is not a menu option offered to most or all. She could offer it under certain circumstances (more money, smaller dick etc) and be eligible for a higher score but she'd have to put that out there and change her profile.
You don't have to offer Greek to get a 10. Just 3 of the 5 requirements.
I am sorry that's wrong.... the site needs to update the profile as the reviews are posted. We give them all the data they need.... they choose to disregard that data and not update it.....If the first reviewer is a nasty slob who wants a 15 minute bust a quick nut session......The poor girl is doomed..... That jackass might bust his nut in 5 minutes ...and then go back and write a review saying that says he felt rushed...it was CBJ only no kissing no DATY ....no GFE...... giving her a 5 or 6..... I am sorry..... that's not fair for the provider.....
Now if the second reviewer has a "real" session an hr or more...and they connect. She is a true GFE session ....they get along great, she's easy to talk to, she's seductive, she puts him at ease and FUCKS his brains out!!! GFE in every way including BBBJ DFK,and GREEK and a host of other acronyms including multiple shots a t goal. According to TER she isn't eligible for a 9 or 10 because her PROFILE says she isn't eligible......
the system is flawed......