Speaking as someone who has seen Kayla and reviewed her on this board, I'll throw my 2 cents in.

Yes, amazing figure and very sexy/hot. What bothered me was the lack of "truth in advertising", as I did not know I was with a TV instead of a TS. (It was my first time). I have no problems with TV's, I would just prefer to spend my hard earned money on a TS.

Now, as far as rumor and conjecture goes, there's a lot out there -- including other providers who were friends with her. Since I did not experience it first hand, I'll refrain from repeating here. Maybe someone else will share their experiences?

I saw her about a year and a half ago in LA.  didn't know she was not a ts but a tv until into the apt.  enthusiastic service.  I prefer TS's so don't think I'd see Kayla again but she was prompt and provided a good service with multiple cups.

This is an issue where increased risk factor must be addressed... A  TV provider who also does Gay Porn and is working both sides of the street increases the risk factor of STD....Kayla is a hard worker and doubles his exposure to both the Gay and TS world. Double the exposure = Double the action = Double the risk..  I must consider this when making decisions on who I see and don't see... He may be a great lay, but.......

He and I say he because he is just that, a TV not a TS is rude and obnoxious. If I wanted a TV I would ask for a TV but I want a TS and I hate being lied to.