No, the policy hasn't chanced. I just checked it and it say Andy future review replace the only one.
So I noticed that a reviewer has posted back to back reviews of the same provider with really no new details to share. I didn't think this was possible or allowed. Is this a bogus review situation? I see girls repeatedly but wouldn't think I'd be allowed by TER to review them repeatedly unless the quality of the service had changed quite substantially in either a positive or negative direction. Am I missing something? What's up with dat?
So it must be a glitch. Report it?
I didn't consider it might be a glitch. It appears the reviewer used the second review to talk about why no one had reviewed the provider since his last review... and also to tell other cllients that they should let the provider know that it is he who they should name drop when they see the provider. I have reported this. Thanks for the suggestion River.
Yes this doesn't sound like a legit review. Sounds more like this guy is trying to score brownie points with the provider or the provider has coax him into leaving the second review. Either way its good you reported it.
In the past the new review replaced the old one. Now the old review stays up. However it is supposed to be different.
Read rule #9 of the updated review guidelines:
I've seen more of these lately too. I believe the same reviewer is allowed to write more than one review for the same provider. It's no longer considered an update to an old review and will not replace the existing one. The rules concerning this have not been updated to reflect the new policy last I checked.
No, the policy hasn't chanced. I just checked it and it say Andy future review replace the only one.
they wrote me back earlier today about this after I reported. they indeed did change the policy. i tried to post what they sent me earlier it was blocked. I am sometimes confused by the oversight methodologies