Its not RR. Talent in the industry is tested via NAT HIV, which is a test that detects the presence of HIV nucleic acid, and is accurate to within 4 days of transmission. On its own relining on a test (no matter now good it is) is total crap because its only relevant to the point of blood draw it was taken (+/-4 days), however if paired with a PrEP, such as Truvada, the risk is zero. It would actually have been wiser to require a performer to take some form of PrEP than even worry about conddoms.

i appreciate support of you & LATSDog vis-a-vis Prop 60. it was much more of a wolf in sheep's clothing than "porn performers must wear condoms" as the 1 man behind it portrayed Prop 60. And as a point of information, the CA Occupational Safety & Hazards Administration that regulates worker safety, already has told producers that it believes condoms are part of a safe workplace. My understanding is that Producers & CAL OSHA are in talks to workout a compromise since the industry believes a blanket rule will drive production out of CA and/or into the shadows. Prop 60 was a blunt force object ignoring those talks as well as adding other dangerous provisions such as a private citizen being able to sue a producer for adult videos that depict sex without condoms. e.g., I produce videos for my website and that makes me a producer and i therefore could be sued when somebody sees one of my videos where thee is no condom used.

Lots more info at dontharassca.com since there was a lot more nefarious items in Prop 60 than the foregoing.

Anyways, thanks for your support in defeating Prop 60!
xoxo
kacy tgirl