Politics and Religion

I was interviewed once while on methregular_smile
OSP 26 Reviews 857 reads
posted

Someone a couple of doors down had been shot by his wife overnight. They wanted to know if i'd heard anything.

Maybe if the IRS and its agents had to worry about violent reprisals on a regular basis they'd clean up their wholly ILLEGAL act.

  It would also be to the People’s benefit if providers & hobbyists alike left a few dead cops whenever a “sting” is perpetrated on our community. Cops would no longer be PRO-active in their moralist quest, and conversely take a RE-active stance like they do with burglary, robbery, car-jacking, gang-banging, etc.  

It's the politicians that write the laws that they are required to enforce. And, I don't believe in killing politicians, but rather voting and organizing against the corrupt and ineffectual ones.

I hate the IRS very much.  That said, I wish this guy had survived so he could be strung up by his thumbs.

I read hour after hour of testimony of the children and wives and mothers of murder victims and the impact it has on their life.  I wait to read that stuff until late in the day, so I can have a drink.

The IRS agent killed has a mother and maybe kids and a wife, husband, lover, or somebody.

I don't think he is a terrorist because he isn't connected to any movement, had no support, did not rely on any one for encouragement or advice.

He is a classic nut-case criminal.  He killed and hurt people who belonged to a group I didn't like, but they were people and didn't deserve to be hurt or killed.

How does murder and violence help this situation?  

This is about as stupid as the Pro-Life folks who bomb abortion clinics.  

And good luck trying to defend yourself someday if you are caught killing a cop who just busted someone by using a prostitution sting.

No, the guy who flew the plane into the IRS building is not a terrorist.  I agree with that. He's just a whack job that let his anger overcome whatever brains and common sense he may have had.

It certainly brings the problem to bear.

Abuse of IRS powers and subsequent suicides by otherwise rational, law abiding citizens is far too common. Abortion issues effect only 1/2 the population. The IRS and its abuses affect EVERYBODY.

TRUE!  There would be NO defense for a civic minded person who put a couple of rounds into a cop's head for the aforementioned reason(s).
In fact our society has been so well brainwashed that if a cop went on a rampage of rape in a pre-school one would still be charged as a "Cop Killer" in the stopping him from raping and sodomizing as many children as he intended.  

And was he "whacko" before the IRS made it impossible for him to simply exist, or did they DRIVE him to this extreme?

I'm sure the IRS is no angel in all of this and I am not defending that agency.  I just think that no matter how bad a situation can get, taking your own life and endangering the lives of others to do it is way too extreme.  And nobody or no agency can be blamed for driving him to that extreme.

I don't know the particulars and I really don't want to know all of them, but there had to more problems for this guy to go to that extreme.  The IRS may have been the final straw.  Still, actions like this cannot be praised in any way.

Income tax is the easiest tax to deal with.
You have earned the money!
You should have the money for the tax you owe!
If you have no income you owe no tax.
If you don't then don't cry when the IRS takes everything you own!

I view myself as a "Citizen", and a sovereign one at that.

You can call yourself anything you want.  It does NOT excuse you from doing your civic duty and paying you taxes!

That's the law held up by all federal and state courts.

I don't care if a place is eliminated as long as people weren't in the place.

Before you get all crazy left winged on us a question; Does PETA react in ways similar to this attack in question?

You will never see me defend the tactics of PETA.
But when has anyone been killed by a PETA action?

Timbow1051 reads

What an idiotic statement that this  fucking loon   is a hero . He   damn committed murder and  killed a person and could have willingly caused the death  of  many others . He  endangered the lives of many  committing this coward act of selfish  suicide .
If he had to kill himself he should have just put a gun to his head . Special place in hell for him now.

-- Modified on 2/19/2010 11:56:26 AM

Unintended Consequences by John Ross
http://www.john-ross.net/store.php

Molon Labe by Boston T. Party
http://www.javelinpress.com/molon_labe.html

------------

By noting these books I am not advocating illegal activity. I simply find them entertaining and thought-provoking.

The activities described in these books will be unneeded because of the results of implementing the non-violent approach in THIS book:

http://www.starvingthemonkeys.com/

Our IRS and the politicians that give it its power are evil.

HR 3162 SEC. 802 DEFINITION OF DOMESTIC TERRORISM

"(5) the term `domestic terrorism' means activities that--
  (A) involve acts dangerous to human life that are a violation of the criminal laws of the United States or of any State;
  (B) appear to be intended--
     (i) to intimidate or coerce a civilian population;
     (ii) to influence the policy of a government by intimidation or coercion; or
     (iii) to affect the conduct of a government by mass destruction, assassination, or kidnapping"

By the legal definition already laid out in the US Code, I would say that he's a terrorist, regardless of whether he was a member of a group or not.

As for the IRS, they are hardly illegal, as anyone who's read Article 1, Section 8 of the Constitution and the 16th Amendment can attest.

Dead cops and politicians don't bother me much, but violence isn't necessary. What is necessary is enacting a form of direct democracy so the people can keep a check on our representatives.

I would be the first to admit that the tax code in this country needs to be seriously overhauled, but paying your taxes is your patriotic duty. If you don't like the admission fee, then get out of the park.

-- Modified on 2/19/2010 1:24:30 PM

Timbow1171 reads

''Dead cops and politicians don't bother me much, but violence isn't necessary''

Wow y'all got some strange values :)





-- Modified on 2/19/2010 3:20:31 PM

I have been a law abiding citizen for 53 years(save for my hobbying and Marijuana use). I can't recall ONE TIME when dealing with a cop he/she didn't try to push a hot button or overtly search for some way to turn a simple 'fix-it ticket' or LESS into probable cause for further harassment and hopefully arrest.

 IMO the most cathartic joy to be found in life is a cop killed execution style.  

Timbow1143 reads

''IMO the most cathartic joy to be found in life is a cop killed execution style.''


You gangsta you !  



-- Modified on 2/19/2010 3:37:50 PM

You are one sick person.  You have labeled every police officer as crooked for the perceived actions of a few.  And then to say you find joy in execution-style killings??????

One of the toughest jobs in the world is being a police officer.  Especially with people like you -- that want to see them executed -- that they have to "serve and protect."

...if you think the cops actually do that, be in favor of gun control since self defense isn't necessary.

cops are NEVER there when you need them. But they're more than happy to stick their nose in your personal business.

RRO2610,
"have been a law abiding citizen for 53 years(save for my hobbying and Marijuana use). I can't recall ONE TIME when dealing with a cop he/she didn't try to push a hot button or overtly search for some way to turn a simple 'fix-it ticket' or LESS into probable cause for further harassment and hopefully arrest."

In my lifetime I have only seen a few people who had no clue what they were doing or how they were acting while smoking herb.I am fairly confident  you could join that group, since "all" the police you come in contact with want to harass you.. You must  not realize the altered mental state you portray under the influence.
I have been pulled by police many times more than the average person, and only once did I have a policeman try to push any buttons and my continued polite manner simmered him down quickly..



And since I have a doctor's prescription for it I would be breaking no law if I ever do; but dollars to donuts the ubiquitous bully pathology of the copper along with the enabling by his alliance with the authoritarian sect would no doubt cause me problems when there wasn't one to start with.

 As a youngster and even into my teens I viewed the police as a strict but humane authority to me and the community as a whole. The police evolved however into a cold, para-military force since the late 1970s creating a prevailing US vs THEM mentality in BOTH camps.    
They now hold far too much power; in weaponry and delegated authority as well. The curse of corruption by said “power” will someday soon prove again “absolute”.  

Someone a couple of doors down had been shot by his wife overnight. They wanted to know if i'd heard anything.

bong_water1784 reads

Well I have and its no picnic. Coppers took my bong and my stash once. That was back in 65 though.
I got a new bong now.

GaGambler2175 reads

The most entertaining was while "tripping". Back in the 70's there was no test to detect LSD, as long as you didn't mix it with other drugs you could laugh your ass off at the police and even though they were sure I was on "something" they had no way of proving it. lmao

I have no idea how I survived the 70s. lol

bong_water693 reads

LSD was a very insidious drug indeed. I once fucked 8 or 12 women one rainy weekend in 68 after ingesting some of that stuff. I thought I had been transformed into a horny flying racehorse. Those were fun times.

GaGambler1477 reads

but I have no desire to revisit those days, except for waxing nostalgic about them.

I'll stick with my current drug of choice, Booze. lol

bong_water1956 reads

I like to keep a clear head these days.

Tyranny is rampant when Government obtains absolute power..
When Government and  Authority are  no longer in place ,tyranny would take hold in many areas as small as your neighborhood.
The crips or the trips or the blood or the crud would be the new tyrannical government in town.
The police are necessary and 99.99% do a good job.

Street gangs act as a form of authority.

The only way to eliminate tyranny is to equally distribute authority to everyone. Cops aren't needed. Communities should look out for their own.

Quad, I'm betting you've never seen up close and personal what a person can do with a night stick when he has nothing to fear about the consequences of his actions. 99.99% of cops doing a good job is laughable. Google "police brutality" sometime.

willy"Street gangs act as a form of authority.
The only way to eliminate tyranny is to equally distribute authority to everyone. Cops aren't needed. Communities should look out for their own."



There are 803,742 police in the United States including the 122,474 federal police.
In 2004 57 law enforcement officers were slain by criminals and over 50,000 assaulted with 12000 sustaining injury....
Sometimes a cop has to use the billystick to persuade a criminal to calm down..I have seen people harass the police and resist arrest and they got the beating they deserved IMO..If more people gave the police the respect they deserve the few who go off wouldn't be so jumpy.

Looking at the amount of calls police have to answer, and 24 hours a day, 365 days a year protecting the public, a few thousand "claims" of police brutality is not so much IMO, and a whole lot less than the amount of brutality that would exist, if your  suggested method of communities looking out for their own was in place..No system of hiring is perfect but overall the police do a good job being civil.
I will take a police beating anyday over a vigilante mob, or a chickenshit crowd that simply watches while someone is being harmedor one person taking the law in their own hands.

http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2007/09/14/national/main3262871.shtml

http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/2009/09/24/d-c-s-most-harassing-neighborhoods/

http://www.worldstarhiphop.com/videos/video.php?v=wshhpE6Fugc4kz97S5BU

http://minnesota.publicradio.org/display/web/2007/08/23/rape/?rsssource=1

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/charles-karel-bouley/a-city-and-nation-of-byst_b_338383.html

It's so rampant that Congress had to pass a law giving the Justice Department the power to reform local police departments from the top down. From '94 when this law was enacted to 2003, the Justice Department had to take such action against the Pittsburgh Bureau of Police, Steubenville Police Department, New Jersey State Police, Los Angeles Police Department, District of Columbia Metropolitan Police Department, Highland Park, Illinois Police Department, Cincinnati Police Department, Columbus Police Department, Buffalo Police Department, Mount Prospect, Illinois Police Department, and the Montgomery County, Maryland Police Department. 99.99% of cops are decent? Riiiight.

the last desperate act of an insane person. The question that should be addressed in this case is which came first , the desperation or the insanity. Suicidal people are generally considered to be insane so I am going to say that the desperation came first. The implication is that under the correct conditions any of us can become desperate and if desperation breeds insanity it can happen to any of us. I don't know if suicide is the usual result of  extreme desperation but there seems to be lots of evidence that it is so.  

I say all of this to point out that shooting at cops is one way to attempt suicide. I won't say that a well organized assault on the capitalist class to seize state power by any means necessary is not worth considering though. Most posters to this board are a bit too spineless to consider that course of action so when some insane person is driven to a solitary desperate action against the
capitalist class just hope the next desperate person won't be you.

But suicide is not automatic proof of insanity.

Many people in war undertake suicidal actions under order from superiors.

So you are suggesting that the guy thought that he was at war with the IRS? There are far better ways to deal with the IRS than undertaking a suicidal attack on an IRS office.

Suicidal attacks are a wasteful use of combatants.
While there are historical accounts of suicidal military activities most ended in disaster or failed to accomplish their intended objectives.

IMHO atheists are far less prone to commit suicide than people who believe that there is life after death thus they are able to more effectively deal with desperation and the causes of it.

And I agree -- his suicide attack was a waste of resources.

We have a government whose primary purpose is NOT to "secure the blessings of liberty" for the posterity of the founders; but rather -- like some monstrous sentient organism -- to protect itself.

Yes, courts of ruled that the 16th Amendment cannot be challenged. It is like Thomas Jefferson pointed out in the Kentucky Resolution: Even though our national government has three branches, they are still three branches of one entity -- and that one entity cannot be expected to sit in unbiased adjudication of itself in issues where it has a self-interest.

But that is exactly what we have. We have given the IRS powers that destroy the Bill of Rights by requiring people to testify against themselves by default; and by creating a set of laws so inscrutable that even CPAs are in doubt as to what is or isn't correct. In fact, it is SO inscrutable that even advice received directly from IRS employees is not considered a defense.

Our tax code, written as it is, is nothing but a tool of tyranny.

Here is one of the most common examples.

Someone owes taxes and doesn't pay them. The IRS sends their employer a "Notice of Intent to Levy." The employer then takes the worker's pay -- and sends it to the IRS to satisfy the Levy.

Now, look at the Bill of Rights. WHAT is required before anyone's property may be seized? A WARRANT. Where is the warrant? There is none. Thousands of times a week, people have their pay seized based on nothing more than a letter from the IRS -- without a hearing, trial or anything.

And this same thing happens with bank accounts, etc.

The 16th Amendment has been implemented in such a way as to negate all of our most fundamental rights -- even such rights as free exercise of religion. Practically any tax payer is just a dice-roll away from ruin.

This sort of system has no place in a FREE country. If we are going to have taxes, those laws should be impartial and simple enough that anyone with a 6th grade education can figure out if he is breaking the law or not. Our tax code is so large that nobody could read it in his lifetime.

Meanwhile, many IRS agents, and this is documented in the Congressional record, take joy in pushing people past their psychological breaking point. People commit suicide ALL THE TIME over problems with the IRS.

Any organization can only run roughshod over so many people before they run across someone that they push to suicide who decides he might as well take some of his tormentors along with him.

So, until such time as the IRS and its mad-dog tactics of terror are reined in and the legal infrastructure is comprehensible and reasonably fair; you will occasionally get stuff like this. It is an inevitable result.

I am not endorsing the behavior -- only saying it is inevitable.

Meanwhile -- on the police issue; I think there are some issues that aren't being considered.

Our police forces have become increasingly militarized in the zeal to counter terrorism and escalate the war on drugs.

Nowadays, it is not at all unusual to have a SWAT team or paramilitary police wing conduct a drug bust using commando-style assaults under no-knock warrants. These include the use of flash-bang grenades, battering rams, fully automatic weapons and more. Just the entry techniques are so incredibly traumatic that there are documented cases of suspects (who were later found to be innocent) dropping dead from literal heart-failure during the entry. These branches of law enforcement have been heavily funded and so have proliferated and they are being used in circumstances where, a few years ago, just a couple of regular officers would have shown up.

There are hundreds of documented cases that have made the news where these raids were conducted on innocent people; resulting in their deaths, their homes being burned down from fires sparked by the grenades, other property destruction without reimbursement and severe trauma and PTSD in the victims.

One such case occurred to a next-door neighbor. His ex-wife dropped a dime on him that he might have some pot. During a weekend when he had his kid with him; and his kid was sleeping in the bed with him; police executed a commando style raid. Awakened from a sound sleep by the sudden commotion and disoriented, he reached for his bedside lamp so he could see. (No guns were in his home). And he was shot to death in bed next to his kid. No pot. Oops.

While I understand the importance of police and value their function sufficiently that I've even been made an honorary member of a police union; I am not so foolish as to believe police can go on acting this way without reaping the whirlwind.

Already, police refer to non-police as "civilians" when -- in reality -- they are civilians too. But they are no longer, in too many cases, "us." They see themselves as separate and apart from the communities they serve. And they are far too often exempted from just punishment when they slay the innocent.

While I believe police need a fair amount of slack; and should even be allowed to make mistakes just like anyone else -- the overall landscape of law enforcement in this country his changed in a fashion antithetical to liberty.

And because our cops are used to enforce unjust laws and  too often as persecutors and even hangmen of the innocent -- people are losing the respect and esteem for them in which they were once held. Many people who, even 20 years ago, saw the cop as a friend to whom they could turn in need; now see the cop as a dangerous enemy there to collect revenue, enforce unfair and unjust laws and potential killers of citizens by accident.

We are judged by society as hobbyists -- not by the best among us -- but by the worst. The same applies to cops.

Thus, the good and righteous in law enforcement still have to contend with the attitudes created by the evil and unjust in their profession.

I have seen cops outright lie on the witness stand for no greater purpose than to try to make a speeding ticket stick. When this happens to enough people; cops come to be seen as dishonest for other purposes as well. Did the cop who lied about the traffic ticket tell the truth about the drug bust?

Thus cops are going to be the unfortunate and unwitting targets of a certain percentage of innocent people whose lives they have destroyed.

And -- one other thing. Do some research on Civil Property Forfeiture. This is a process, vetted by the Supreme Court, in which government agents can seize anything you own -- cash, property, etc. -- on mere SUSPICION that it has something to do with crime ... EVEN IF you are never charged with that crime!

Thousands of times a day in this country, people have their property, cash and other assets essentially stolen without them ever being charged with a crime. In fact, it is a MAJOR source of funding for many police departments; so they are literally incentivized to do this.

Again -- it is just a matter of time. This ultimately creates, again, an environment in which citizens at large come to fear and distrust police.

And let me tell you the secret of where hate originates. It originates in fear and distrust.

People fear and distrust the IRS -- and many hate the organization.

And an increasing number of people fear and distrust police -- leading, again, to hate.

The bottom line is that no organization -- government or otherwise -- should expect to be able to kill innocent people, browbeat them, harass them and ruin their lives with impunity indefinitely.

While I do not support the actions of the man who crashed the plane into the iRS offices; I DID read his note and I DO understand where he is coming from. He wasn't crazy. He had simply allowed himself to be pushed too far; and decided to take a few of his tormentors with him when he died.

Expect to see this more often in the future.

I don't endorse it -- but it is the inevitable result of injustice.

Timbow1890 reads

''He wasn't crazy. He had simply allowed himself to be pushed too far; and decided to take a few of his tormentors with him when he died.''

He was a murderer.

Government itself is not the problem. There always has to be government and taxes.

"He had simply allowed himself to be pushed too far; and decided to take a few of his tormentors with him when he died."

Individual terrorist attacks are not the solution to problems with the IRS. Nothing in the struggle to live under reign of capitalism is worth suicide.

That is, that government itself is not the problem; nor taxes. In fact, I pointed out how government and taxes could exist WITHOUT creating this sort of scenario.

His issues were not with capitalism -- but specifically with the government.

Personally, I do not see our economic system as capitalist. I see it as an oligarchy of vested interests in bed with politicians all scratching each other's backs. That's not capitalism.

If capitalism is defined by who owns the means of production then for lack of a better term, I say the US is capitalist and has a government that is controlled by capitalists. You are implying that the US has little to no"free market" capitalism. I tend to agree with that implication. Working class people are forced to invest money in capitalist enterprises that are economically unstable. The capitalist class has systematically removed almost all taxpayer supported benefits that once supported working and middle class citizens. Any attempt to direct tax money to any policy that would support the middle class is blocked by our capitalist controlled government.

In free market capitalism there are few and low barriers to entry into the market. Anyone who gets tired of working for XYZ Corp can go out and start ABC corp and compete. Thus, there is a natuaral limit to any form of exploitation and also (maybe especially) a limit to the amount of wealth that either corporation can accumulate.

This is free market capitalism.

There comes a point in any organization where the costs of administration balloon beyond the value of economies of scale. Organizations can only grow beyond that size when they appeal to government to enforce artificial barriers to entry into the market to protect them from competition. And this protection from competition automatically forces people to work for them who otherwise would work for themselves or a competitor -- thus creating a captive labor force.

This is finance capitalism. It cause huge accumulations of wealth that are used in a feedback loop with government to create a ruling oligarchy and barriers to entry into the market that limit participation to those already wealthy and/or in that particular market.

Register Now!