-- Modified on 11/2/2004 1:56:16 AM
With the resent influx of inquiries looking for provider with an au natural bush, would you say the average provider should let it grow in or should they continue to keep a well manicured lawn? I would think that a large part of the fantasy would be in the encounter of a very different women unlike you current partner, i.e.: girlfriend or wife and view the well manicured bush as an incentive/ part of the fantasy of what you do see on the norm or should the provider seek to look like the norm, and if the well manicured lawn if perceived as not the norm and closer to what is view in magazines and current playboy, hustler photo Op, would that put the well manicured provider near PSE experience? ; )`and last but not least, do most guys see providers for the fantasy end, or a next to a realist girlfriend experience
But a woman is going to do what she is going to do lol Keep that lawn MOWED!!!
You know as much as I would like to say it is just for you that I have a smooth, bare kitty,i t isn't just for you guys that some of us keep it barren in the hair department. Some of us
have an extreme dislike of hair down there. umm me for example.
I love not having little hairs poke through my pretty panties.
I love the way it makes me feel squeaky clean.
I love that ladies and gents tend to linger down there a little longer than before.
I love not having to worry about getting those little hairs caught in the little creases of the battery compartments to some of my toys.
Plus you can't say it doesn't look any lovelier than when you can actually see the wet dripping dwon the sweet pink fruit of my womanhood instead of just seeing the fuzz.
So I will be bare and wear nothing down there!!!
When I grew up, all the Playmates were natural, so I guess that shaped my perception of what is sexy. While I think you can have too much hair down there, I find the totally shaved look kinda creepy. Guys who are 10-20 years younger than me will likely hold the opposite view.
Now that doesn't apply to legs & armpits. Hair growing there is a real turn-off.
I must admit that after a while the novelty of a shaved kitty has worn a little thin. I simply assumed that providers did it for grooming reason - short or no hair being easier to care for as well as for health reasons. At first no hair was hot - and still can be on an appropriately young waif like girl...if you are into that "developing teenager' sort of look. Personally I'd love to see a provider with a hairy bush for a change...it makes the GFE seem more "real world" down & dirty.
It is a real fantasy and sensual area for me. I used to shave my ex-wife's private area. It was a huge turn-on for both of us.
Dont providers love a shaved c*ck?? Makes sense us guys would like a smooth p*ssy to play with as well, no stray hairs to collect in our throats. That subject was covered pretty well in "curb your enthusiasm"
and see where it gets you.
Why does most of the American porno industry feature women with shaved pussies?; Because that's what the market wants!, and when I'm laying down several Benjamin's for a GFE I want the type of GFE that keeps a very tight racing stripe or a clean shaven pussy.
If you wish to sport a big hairy natural bush go ahead. Just don't expect as large of a market as the ladies who keep it VERY tightly trimmed or clean shaven.
Cm.
P.S. Keep in mind that when we seek a GFE we're also not wishing to purchase the realism of say PMS, childcare concerns, family problems or general bitchyness. Hence the GFE IS our "fantasy" girlfriend.
-- Modified on 11/2/2004 12:09:41 AM
That's all up to you girls, shaven or natural.
But as far as my opinion goes, there are a lot of guys seek more natural look rather than bold.
I guess it's because looks more " real & natural".
I am not sure how many wives or our girlfriends shave clean down there, this might be one of GFE ?
Just my opinion, though I don't mean jungle bush, well trimmed, that's what I mean.
Everybody has their own preference. Personally, I like a smooth surface down below with just a small patch directly above the promised land. That way, I know I'm with a woman instead of a child.
For me, it depends on the kitty.
Some look good to me shaved, others don't. Some look good with hair, others don't.
I have particular personal tastes (bad pun?) in the kind of kitty that really turns me on, but other form factors don't necessarily put a damper on things. I'm probably much more concerned that it is totally clean and odor free. I've been pretty lucky in that department so far.
Overall, though, I'd probably preferred a short-trimmed package: not totally bald, but not furry, either.
I too grew up with a great attraction to the pubes. Playboy did not show pubes until about 1970 and when they did it seemed like a giant step forward for porn. Now with so many providers shaved, what will happen to all the time-honored metaphors regarding the genitalia? How does one muff-dive when there is no muff?.. Munch a furburger where there is no fur??..Shuck the bearded clam when there is no beard?
I recall when there were "fetish" magazines featuring shaved pussy. Now there are "fetish" websites for hairy ones.
But, the idea of munching on hair, grosses me out (especially when you don't know where the hair's been, before your mouth goes on it..Nastyyyyyyyyyyy lol). But then again, these days, there are so may types of fetishes out there, so nothing surprises me anymore lol
but whenever I see one of those shiny plastic looking hairless pudenda I am reminded of a place card holder.
I think they look 'interesting' rather than erotic and the pre-pubescent overtones are a little disturbing. I'm all for a neatly trimmed look, but I am a woman, not a 10 year old girl and have no aspirations to mimic one.
-- Modified on 11/2/2004 5:17:42 PM
"Place card holder"...priceless.
Personally, I prefer some pubic hair. I'm not as aroused with a bare muff.
I agree with you.
Though I am fetish nor looking for a jungle, natural look with grooming attracts me a lot.