jt - like your earlier idea. These individuals know what they are doing. I have been attracted to just about every one of these ads, who wouldn't be? I have been close to calling several of these ads, but luckily the radar has been up, either because of a lack of reviews or the pictures were just to hot (I figure girls that hot have to have reviews).
-- Modified on 10/8/2004 2:33:35 PM
Here's what I know/remember. If anyone else has anything to add, please post them or if you've seen someone below and can verify the pic/provider please do so.
Personally got taken by Kimberly
http://www.eros-dc.com/files/ch-cf1-kimberly1.htm
These pictures/ads have come up before:
http://www.eros-dc.com/files/se-vanessa141-vanessa1.htm
http://www.eros-dc.com/files/bo-gina74.htm
http://www.eros-dc.com/files/se-julia61.htm
The following are pretty obvious:
http://www.eros-dc.com/files/danata1-sherry1.htm
http://www.eros-dc.com/files/danata1-mila2.htm
http://www.eros-dc.com/files/danata1-michelle1.htm
http://www.eros-dc.com/files/danata1-lana1.htm
From Jeopcon1:
http://www.eros-dc.com/files/se-lucie2.htm
jt - like your earlier idea. These individuals know what they are doing. I have been attracted to just about every one of these ads, who wouldn't be? I have been close to calling several of these ads, but luckily the radar has been up, either because of a lack of reviews or the pictures were just to hot (I figure girls that hot have to have reviews).
-- Modified on 10/8/2004 2:33:35 PM
I'd have to agree on 'too hot'.. When you see someone with photos as smokin as the ones in this thread, with NOT ONE review, then there has to be some radar alert as to why.
They are all clearly pro pix, and my guess is they're mostly simply stock photos of pro porn models. They probably assume, and perhaps justified, that guys will show up and as long as there's a live woman answering the door, they'll get sucked in and pay. And in many cases, pay more than once.
The legit women all have reviews, and many have them going back a year or more. Even a few reviews would be enough to prove they're real. If they simply rename and re-phone themselves over and over, they avoid the negative reviews, and keep ripping guys off willing to pay for something other than the lady pictured.
Since Eros can't actually verify the pics are real, and other than a review, there's no way to prove anything, the choices are taking one for the team or waiting for them to be reviewed or recognized by someone with sharp eyes or long memories!
I'd still love to have a verified photo site. There's got to be a way to verify.. For out of town women, maybe it's simply a webcam thing.. I'm going to review the potential of some sort of verified thing as I design and run websites, and if there's an interest in this, maybe i'll pursue it more. My idea would be that anyone can submit photos but they'd have to submit to a webcam interview to compare the photos are real. While this wouldn't tell anyone if she's any good, at least you'd know who answers the door is who you expect..!
--JB
Every week,
someone starts a fake ad list with URL's and we just keep adding to it until all the fakes are identified.
Can you tell I'm getting tired of getting ripped-off?
If the girl that answers the door is not the girl you made an appointment with,walk away.
I had made two appointments with who I thought was going to be one person and someone completely different opened the door. Fool me one, shame on you. Fool me twice...
Been trying to do something similar at home. I keep photos (with original filenames) and text listings of negative 'ripoff' comments. Tried to make a database of this info but got lazy recently. Could contribute some of this stuff.
It would work like the Helpful Links post in the Newbies section.
A guy posted a review on another board a couple of days ago that said "Lucie" may be the same person thats in the pics, but her tits are much smaller, she doesnt try to look very good, and she gives a bad performance.