resonable hygiene! I think yhe provider should expect impecable hygiene, just as we do. Although that one may fall into the you're only going to get back what you are willing to give category?
Would it be a good idea for providers to have an option of responding to their reviews? I read some reviews of usually top-notch ladies and the guy is like, "I wanted to stick my dick in her but she kept her hand there, I made the bitch take it anyways" etc. etc. and I'm like... hey, I know that girl and that guy must have had a 14 inch tool or was just to f-ugly or fat you know what I mean?
It would be a good way for Jen, for instance, to say... look I've been less than sparkling lately but I'm feeling good about this career and I hope you all can give me another chance.
Or for another one to say, look if you saw this guy you'd know what the problem was... he's a 2 looking for an 8.
Well, just an idea.
I think that would be a awesome awesome idea and could cut down on girls having to ask for reviews to be pulled. For instance a guy I saw recently put in my review that we had sex although that is not a normal menu item.
I would have loved to respond and say that this is a case of YMMV cause now alot of guys think i'm full service in general but I'm not.
I think its a good idea. Reviews are helpful, but naturally one sided. Provider opinions would shed a little light on the reviews that seem out of the ordinary or plain mean.
"Or for another one to say, look if you saw this guy you'd know what the problem was... he's a 2 looking for an 8."
Not sure if your giving the guy a "2" was for appearance or performance, but in either case, this is a perfect example of why there shouldn't be responses to reviews--it takes us down a slippery slope when we start accusing customers for customer service problems.
So what if the guy isn't handsome? So what if the guy's technical skills aren't up to snuff? He's not shelling out his money for validation of himself, he's shelling it out to have a nice time with a hot woman who captures his particular fancy.
Yes, he has to be on good beahvior, and yes, he has to practice reasonable hygeine, but beyond that...
An ugly guy pays just as much to see a $300 provider as a handsome one does, and deserves the same efforts. A well skilled guy pays just as much to see a $300 provider as a clumsy oaf, and deserves the same efforts.
If a guy shows up that is so butt-ugly that a provider just can't get past it, then give him his money back and send him on his way. Taking his full donation and then offering him half performance because he's "not qualified to see a provider as hot as me"... He just got ripped off for half of his money, plain and simple.
resonable hygiene! I think yhe provider should expect impecable hygiene, just as we do. Although that one may fall into the you're only going to get back what you are willing to give category?
Omega, I could not have said it any better. You hit the hammer squarely on the nail!
I can understand the provider having "issues" with certain clients and all providers have the right to decline before "services rendered." I also feel providers must realize they are in a "service" orientated business and must treat it accordingly. If providers eagerly accept "donations" for services, then they need to be accountable for that and realize the "customer" has paid and deserves to get what he/she believes they are paying for. Minnesota has some incredible providers but we also have some ripoff artists that feel just because they have the "power of the poon", they can treat some with disrespect and ignorance. Every business has good and bad but WE all want to get what we are paying for.
It appears from some of the reviews that alot of guys here have an inflated sense of.... ego.
I also agree that providers should politely refuse to provide service than provide a half hearted effort for full price.
But I am mainly reacting to what I have seen as very disrespectful and misogynistic reviews ending with the reviewer giving a low score... I think the provider should be allowed to respond.
Your suggestion could be addressed by Staff if put on the suggestion board. I think there are some legal issues though.
We've all been through this situation. A date walks in and for one reason or another we find him repulsive. Do we tell him this, basically saying he's so gross he can't even buy a date? We're supposed to be good at making men feel like they're sexy, which is usually easy, but not without strain on our part. That's got to show a bit.
It's a two edged sword. It seems the ones who truly need to pay for it have issues with women and take it out in reviews.
The truth is that the better adjusted men give the best reviews. They have nothing to prove and are seeing us for a good time. They could have an affair if they chose to. They don't seek perfection, just a good time with no strings attached. These are my observations. So the next time you see a man give a lower than average review picking the lady to part, remember what I said LOL.
If you see a man showing disrespect or giving information that could endanger her, take the time to report the review.
By stepping up and saying something, it shows you have class and care. Kudo's
-- Modified on 1/26/2004 6:25:46 AM
Good points Misty.
thanks, I'm glad some got my point and didn't read a zillion zings into it LOL!!!
Misty, I think you missed the mark a bit when you gave the quote:It's a two edged sword. It seems the ones who truly need to pay for it have issues with women and take it out in reviews.
I for one do pay for it as most people know but DO NOT have issues with ladies. Due to my schedule and situation, I find spending some quality time with a lady with out strings is very nice.
I can think of a number of other well known providers in similar situations that pay for it and also do NOT have issues with ladies.
Now, before all the providers get bent out of shape and hold off on making posts, this is Misty's opinion. I am just disagreeing with it.
No, I just wasn't clear to those that took this too personally.
I meant this to those 2 of 100 that it applies, including the joker that seems to be bashing each lady he's seen... being spoken about in this thread.
Hasn't anyone else noticed certain reviewers just don't ever seem happy with their dates compared to the others reviewing the same providers? Guess I'm just not getting through to some.
There are a few disjointed men who hobby, don't ya think? LOL
I hope you were joking. And I think MDL was too kind. But if you weren't joking ...
"It seems the ones who truly need to pay for it
have issues with women and take it out in reviews."
"The truth is that the better adjusted men give the best reviews.
They have nothing to prove and are seeing us for a good time.
They could have an affair if they chose to.So the next time you see a man give a lower than average review picking the lady to part, remember what I said. LOL."
So are you saying (1) if Joe give a bad review it probably is because he is not "better adjusted?" It has nothing to do with the provider - she was a 10 - Joe just has issues with women. And if someone saw YOU and didn't give YOU a great review he was by definition not "better adjusted." Is that how reviews get deleted? "Dear TER: please delete Joe's review of me - he obviously isn't "better adjusted." I suggest no reviews below an 9 be posted - who wants the opinion of someone not "better adjusted?"
By the way - better adjusted than whom? You?
Yes, all those women out there waiting to have an affair - sex for free! - and we fools are paying for it seeing providers - like you." All you "better adjusted guys can save your cash! But wait! If all the "better adjusted" just had affairs, and only the lesser adjusted saw providers, and then there would be only bad reviews . . . oh my God it's a Catch-22.
Misty, are providers who keep guys' contact info and call them "better adjusted" than those who don't do that?
P.S. Are women who provide sex for money "better adjusted" than women who don't? Just curious.
The operative word would be NEED to pay for it, not choose to pay for it.
Also, lower than her average reviewers give her. This is a general statement. Thanks for taking me literally. Email me please. From some of your comments, it seems we need to talk.
-- Modified on 1/26/2004 3:33:23 PM