New York

Re:New agency- Primabella escorts
DMOSES 9549 reads
posted

Some of the girls look fake.  Who did you see?

I never do this, but I just wanted everybody to know that I had a good experience with this agency in Manhattan.

Easy going, fun, reliable, hot.

Does anyone have similar news?

sean

Glad it worked out for you.I look forward to your review. It appears Panther from the NY doggie board had a different experience regarding B & S.
He claims pictures used were from another agency.

I have not had a problem with Bait and switch with this agency.
I've only used them twice though.

Panther had a probelem with another agency anyway.

It's common for girls to be listed at several agencies.

It's hard to write review after each session.

It looks like a bait and switch set-up, since one of the photos (Catherine) is not their girl, it's Claudia from Belle De Jour. Claudia is 5'-9", the Primabella website lists their Catherine as 5-3", and in her profile, they use another pic of another BDJ girl, Brook.

I'm glad someone had agood time, but, my money is not going in that direction. I never patronize those that advertise something that they can never provide. THAT , is the classic bait and switch. IMHO.

Panther (same as the other cat)

panther- thanks for your comments

did not mean to misquote you.

will post revierw soon.

DMOSES9550 reads

Some of the girls look fake.  Who did you see?

Now, you may very well have had a good experience with them, it's possible.

But they're advertising Claudia and Brooke from BDJ as one of their girls. Please. I could see if either one was moonlighting, or even both was moonlighting, but you have one pic of each girl, and the place is calling this hybird "Catherine".

Claudia: http://www.belledejour.net/claudia/claudia006.jpg
Brooke: http://www.belledejour.net/brooke/brook1008.jpg
"Catherine": http://www.primabellaescorts.com/escorts_main.htm

As far as I'm concerned, if an agency will lie once, they should never be trusted. Ever.

That's just me, though ;)

Maybe those dolls at BDJ should call a lawyer about copywright violations.

I took those photos of Claudia and Brooke myself.I find it unusual and very tasteless that this company used my photos to promote their business.


The photos should not be copied and the girls DO NOT WORK FOR THIS COMPANY, THEY ARE VERY MAD that this has been done.

What should I do with this problem. I have called them and they hang up on me constantly.

Kim

Verily, I say to my fellow hobbyists, this thread shows that American men, working together, can still clean up Dodge City.

frankie2003a9792 reads

You may have actually had a good experience but your posts ring false.  Here's why:

You have not identified the women (two you say) with whom you have had the good experiences with.  No reviews needed, just the names of the women on the site who you have seen.

We have been presented with hard facts from a couple of posters that identify pictures of women who do not work at this agency.
Obviously this a huge red flag as far at this agency is concerned.

The burden is now upon you to prove that what you say is not false.

common sense will get you far
fr

I think there is no "burden" or responsibility here. Yuou should always browse this site with a healty dose of sketicism any way.

look at my reviews. thery're honest. I'm honest.

All I wanted to day was I had good luck with this agency. I have never used BDJ, and am suprised at any apparent malfeasance at either place.

frankie2003a10505 reads

I always browse with a healthy dose of skepticism which is
exactly why I asked you to follow up with names so as to prove what you say is correct.

In other words, the other posts make YOUR post suspect.

You're correct that there is no burden or responsibility but the
fact is, if you don't follow up, then there's no reason I would
believe you.

Bottom line, if you don't name the girls you've seen, you don't
get credibility.

Also, your past reviews have nothing to do with this agency so
I don't see how they are relevant.

Also, no one mention there were any "malfeasance" at BDJ, but you seem to imply that there is with the phrase "at either
place".

sean 121510758 reads

Unfortunately I was asked not to name the names.

I know, there's your grain of salt.

Register Now!