Since the legal system is using common abbreviations and acronyms that are used to describe people who are willing to share themselves sexually for “donations”, as evidence against people, can those abbreviations and acronyms be either changed or altered much in the same way that “designer” drugs are changed in such a way that the new version does not fit into an illegal classification?

For example, if GFE is “illegal”, High School Sweetheart, HSS; transform GFE into GFI, intensity.

Given that reviews are evidence, can they be evolved to not being usable as evidence? For example missionary into Puritan, Cow Girl into Pilot, DATY to Australian or AS, Aussie Style.

If escorts and masseuses are required to register, who isn't required to register and would not be required to register? Sugar Baby and Sugar Daddy come to mind; Does one have to be licensed to treat erectile dysfunction? Is it illegal to quantify the results of medications or treatments to treat ED?  

During my annual physical both my prostate and testicles are manual checked, does that require a medical degree?  

Can a consultant teach how to either massage a breast or check for nodes, bumps, abnormal tissue?

A consultancy for safe masturbation techniques covering Master's and Johnson delay technique?

If a reviews indicates covering the theory and practicalities of “religious” text such as certain positions in a classical “Hindu” text, can that be used as evidence?

Of what informational use is the phrase “I filled the cover”? Can “embarrassing moment” be used as a surrogate?

Is it possible to make underlying assumption that all sex is protected and that oral sex, Clinton's Delight, is always available unless specifically as NA? As a result only indications that one does not need to cover their head from the sun while indoors is necessary—one does not offer suntan lotion for bald heads. Free air ending vrs messy free?  

It seems to me that we have evolved past the need to use whatever common phrases are easy targets for illegal activity because of the universal availability of widely disseminated information.  

AND that there is enough technology to thwart easy inspection or interception of communications from providers and partakers.

There are services to provide secure internet connections, pay a fee to an service in another country that sends your internet connection to them from locations in other countries so that connection seems to emanate from third country.

Software to scramble text communications, each party must use the same temporary key to encode and then decode? The partaker must send their personal key to the provider vrs a provider having a personal key.

A service that one dials into to in turn dial a phone number so that the originating phone number is hidden?

Deprived and Devious