Politics and Religion

That's your reasoning or excuse?
RightwingUnderground 1274 reads
posted

You feel surounded by idiots so you'll just join in?

I don't need to be a supporter of her or anyone to desire honest treatment.

Of course not, she has too much class to retaliate in that fashion.

But can you imagine some of the lines that could be written!!!!  "No. 4 -- (Sarah's daughter) went to a Late Show taping and got hit on by David Letterman . . . . "

What goes around always seems to come around, doesn't it?

RightwingUnderground1757 reads

Come on XL. You can do better than that. Comedy requires at least a modicum of truth.

with which she's learning how to count to 10, are called fingers.    Still LMAO.

Snowman391341 reads

she's going to make hell of a lot of money this year.

So let's see, she's been a governor, VP candidate of a major party and now raking in mega bucks!!

Gee, I wonder how your resume stacks up against that.

If she's stupid. I guess that would make you a f**king moron?? Just want to make sure I've got your grading system right.

-- Modified on 10/3/2009 6:45:26 PM

no, it just goes to show you that you can fool most of the people most of the time, there's $$$$$ in freakdom and a willingness to make a public spectacle of oneself, and you'll never go broke underestimating the foolishness of the American public or the American electorate.
I'll content myself with waiting for your MILFy fantasy object to learn how to count either up to or down to 10.

Your heroine is not proof, but sure is a fine example of the conservtive argument that standards in this country have fallen to new lows.

BTW, what's the under/over for how many copies of her book are returned unsold to the publisher, and how many months before their remainder at places like Daedalus and Edward R. Hamilton?

Don't forget that crayons are included with SP's book.

Snowman39850 reads

Let me educate you as you seem to really need it...

First, you make yourself sound really stupid when you talk about her being ignorant when from what I can tell you just hate her for her political views. I use to hear this about Bush during the run against Kerry, forget the fact that Bush had better grades in school. It all boiled down to politics. Blind statements like the one you are making just make you sound juvenile, or perhaps more correctly just shows that you are.

She is not my heroine, and if she ran it is highly unlikely that I would vote for her. I just don't care for people attacking politicians on a personal level. BTW, in most of those cases its the attacker who sounds and is stupid (refer to  first paragraph). Perhaps you might consider bring some facts with you next time. Oh yeah, I forgot, that facts thing generally does not work out well for Liberals.

In regards to the over/under question, since the book has not been relased, hard to say. However, considering the fact that Glenn Beck's book has been flying off the shelf, I would suspect she will do just fine.

Book Sales are definately not a good thing for democrats to use for comparison anyways considering that can't stand the best selling book of all time...

-- Modified on 10/4/2009 12:45:33 AM


Will ya, huh? Otherwise you look silly. I don’t mind that look on you though, but I’m always in favor of intellectual honesty.

Please, don't make me laugh.

I have no doubt that the MILFy ex-governoress will master counting to 10, indeed will master counting to 20, however long it might take, but that's the point where both fingers and toes run out, so...   Speculation ; can you imagine her poor put-upon tutors trying to teach her to count? They'll be like that voice coach in "Citizen Kane."  Talk about frustration.

So tell me, exactly, what is it about this person that produces such loyalty?  She tanked halfway through her term as gov, as soon as the going got a little rough, she was an absolute joke as a VP candidate, and she's going to be an even bigger joke as a Presidential candidate.  So, what is it, exactly, that you find so politicallly appealing about her, except for the fact that she is not a liberal?

Admit it, your girl here is a curiosity, if not a one-woman freak show complete with family [I do sympathise with her re the family problems though -- it really sucks to be sandbagged at every turn by useless blood relatives.  No wonder Todd spends a week at a time at his job, away from his family.  When he reports in for work, does he think of it as taking a sanity break?].  

Hey, here's a Fox sitcom : "Elected, With Children."  Let me think about casting, writing, and directing, and I'll get back to you later.  

BTW, intellectual honesty, you'll pulling either my pud or your pud.  Look around you here, my subsurface mossback correspondent.  Exactly how much of that precious commodity do you see on a daily basis?

I sincerely hope that when you are not stroking the keyboard to compose  yet another post, that you're not stroking off to images of SP.  Is that it?  Are you the most misguided of white knights in this instance?

-- Modified on 10/4/2009 10:15:02 AM

RightwingUnderground1275 reads

You feel surounded by idiots so you'll just join in?

I don't need to be a supporter of her or anyone to desire honest treatment.

"...surrounded by idiots"  Are you including yourself?  BTW, you still haven't clued us  as to what exactly is the basis of your admiration for SP.  

RightwingUnderground1179 reads

for some time now. You aren't very sophisticated after all. You just know lot's of words.

I hit exactly what I was aiming at.

You still haven't told us why you admire SP so.  Or at least why you feel anyone on this board should refrain from criticisms of her, be they insight or otherwise.  I don't chide you re your frequent, ill-tempered and usually half-assed criticisms of POTUS Obama, Pelosi and other portraits in mediocrity. Why indeed do you feel so obligated to spring to the defense of SP?  The original contribution i made hardly justifies the high dudgeon you've allowed yourself to fall into.

Not to worry, i'm patient.  

I think you are more likely to shoot yourself in the foot than you are to hit what you claim to be aiming at.  All that time spent in the dark underground of reactionary conservatism, it can't be doing much for your vision or your aim.  Certainly it's doing nothing for your sense of humor.

I'm not sure why the fact that  I know lot's of words [actually I don't - the conservos are right generally about how badly standards in this country have fallen] troubles you so [but that is just supposition on my part].  Take heart in the fact that your typing skils are far superior.  


LMAO.

If  I get the time, I'll perhaps reread your contributions from last fall re the ex-govenor.  It will be painful to read your thoughts a second time, but I'll be reminded of Marx's quip that history always repeats itself -- it occurs the first time as tragedy, and the second time as farce.

You can’t cite a single post I’ve ever made that indicates the slightest inkling of “admiration” for Palin. If you want to waste your time looking, knock yourself out. I never even came to her defense in this thread. I DID criticize you for you inane criticisms of her intelligence (e.g. can’t count to ten). I was stating that your criticisms here were not intellectually honest and not worthy of your past efforts. I clearly stated that there were plenty of things for which you could legitimately criticize her. Now I doubt you even read my post.

Your vocabulary doesn’t bother me at all. The problem is that you used to know how to use it. Now you demonstrate difficulty stringing together 3 or 4 words worthy of a 3rd grader (i.e. your pitiful denigration of her). You never struck me as the type to project your feelings on a subject onto other people. I was wrong.

But your fixation on my handle now makes sense. Your supposed understanding of its meaning is obviously based on your bigoted assumptions and hatred for anything that reminds you of Sarah Palin.

Palin is a deranged lunatic. A stupid deranged lunatic. Class doesn't even enter into the equation.

You must be looking in the mirror.

It still amazes how the libs are so scared shitless of this woman and the power of the message she represents.

I'm scared that a women who is so utterly misinformed, so utterly stupid, and so utterly insane could have her finger on the button. She is the sort of person who would set off ALL of our nukes to start a rapture fairy tale she has in her stupid little head. I thought Bush was the dumbest ass who could ever have hoped to win Federal office. Next to Palin, Bush looks like Albert Einstein. THE WOMAN DIDN'T EVEN KNOW WHAT THE JOB DESCRIPTION WAS FOR "VICE PRESIDENT". She had no freaking idea. And I'm not the only person who thinks that freaking BIMBO isn't qualified for such a position. Even BUSH said she wasn't qualified.

You need someone smarter than a pet rock in elected office. That's all I'm saying.

Snowman391410 reads

So let's see, she's been a governor, VP candidate of a major party and now raking in mega bucks!!

Gee, I wonder how your resume stacks up against that.

If she's stupid. I guess that would make you a f**king moron?? Just want to make sure I've got your grading system right.

-- Modified on 10/3/2009 6:44:52 PM

Register Now!