I'm getting pretty darn tired of seeing the wholesale offering of 10's to those providers who not only don't do anal but in some cases don't even do CIM or even BBBJ. I actually looked back over my reviews and I was guilty only twice of that transgression and that was because it was two different doubles. I guess the double made it seem like a "one is a lifetime" experience. Not a good excuse but that was my reasoning. What I've done in the past is give a 9 with the explanation that is was a 10 for me but TER guidelines prevent me from giving more than a 9. I understand that when it comes to appearance, beauty is in the eyes of the beholder and what may be a 10 to one hobbyist is only a 7 or 8 to another. That's what makes horse races. However, when there are clear guidelines for what constitutes a 10 in performance, how does a provider who doesn't have a full menu get that kind of score. If the moderators are screening these reviews and see in the profile or in the review that anal or BBBJ or CIM or even DFK is not offered the review should be disallowed and sent back to the hobbyist with a reminder of the guidelines. Anyone else have this same pet peeve?