and irregardless of how smart you think you are, you are not convincing me of anything because you are not articulating it here and continue to attack straw men.
1) Your point about me being naive is irrelevant to my argument, as I have not stated that woman do not feel as you and the OP have outlined. There is no question that they do feel that way, and have those experiences and I have not suggested otherwise. But again, that is not the point.
2) I am not saying she should quit because she has a bad day at work. The litany of complaints in that post do not suggest it is a bad day at work issue, it is describing the horrible and detestable every day working experience of offering sex for cash (per the posters world view anyway).
I go back to her first paragraph. "Unfortunately, I can’t say the same for how the clients leave ME feeling". She doesn't say some clients. She doesn't say this happens sometimes. I can't read her mind, maybe she does mean some, I can only go by what she stated, along with the context of the rest of the complaint specifics.
Lets go to another broad statement:
"How could I let these guys KNOW how TERRIBLE they are??? Let them know how to FIX themselves to make the experience less terrible for me?"
Again, she is swinging a globally wide brush here. My parsing of those words, joined with the rest of the acerbic complaints in the post is that this is a horrible experience for her all the time. And if that is the case, why do it? That is why she should quit, and it has nothing to do with a bad day at work, because she isn't having a bad day, she is discussing a bad every day.
What is retarded is asking men to behave differently than our internal programming allows. (Refer back to the red meat for carnivores in my OP). Our sexual impulses make us want our sex partners to enjoy the experience (well, a majority of us anyway, there is that Neanderthal DNA lurking in there) and it is beyond stupid to stimulate that part of the brain and expect that the man is not going to respond.
Oh, and here is why I would give you an "F" in critical thinking. In three responses to my post, you have not addressed one thing I stated in the first one where I state my objections other than the very first sentence. You took that first sentence and made a treatise out of it, and are arguing against positions that I did not make. As I keep saying, you are not arguing with me, you are arguing with a straw man of your own creation.
So yes, you do miss my point, as so far you have shown no evidence that you even read it.