I think it still usually is. For me, I am usually not disappointed. If a pic is blurred heavily then I will tend to be cautious. I have found that a slightly blurred pic is usually the girl in the pics and will confirm with the booker.

I have discovered several great beauties this way and havent looked back since. Of course unblurred pics are a no brainer..(in some cases).



beemer



Quote:

END OF MESSAGE

My experience so far is every girl i have met was the girl in the picture BUT they touch up face, tits and skin tone over entire body.  Plus girls are heavily made up/dolled up for photo shoot. Tits are slightly enlarged.  For ass i just don't know if girls just pose to enhance their body shape or whether it is touched up.
Typically face is either blurred or they change their jaw line for the worse in pics.
Typically expect 1 to 3 points downgrade from pics.

are  of Japanese Porn actresses and even when they are not the agency/ Booker does a lot of photo shopping to get the look they desire and in some cases to conceal dolls identity from family friends. Google is indeed your friend to get to the truth.

For whatever reason many of the recent arrivals are simply not as beautiful or even pretty as previous talent. It seems brokers are scraping the bottom of the barrel with their exports. The agencies/ bookers are forced to "enhance" the photos.

Is LA's negative reputation finally catching up with us.

Quote:

I've seen around 50 k-girls from LA cityvibe in the past 4 years, and I only recall 1 that I saw that had fake pictures (I left without entering and never used that agency again), although I'm sure most are photoshoped.   However, completely fake pictures have been common among some OC agencies.  That's one reason why I prefer LA.  It may be fake pics are becoming more common in LA now, but I haven't yet personally experienced it.  There are more k-girl ads than ever which may contribute to some increase in fakes.  We should definitely call out the agencies that use fake pics.  This includes in discussion forums, emails, reviews, and to city vibe, etc.

Some people, especially some who do few or no reviews, are quick to blame reviewers for not noting fake pics.  I always do and I bet most reviewers do.  However, I think sometimes agencies try to abuse the review system.  For example, recently I positively reviewed an oc provider, but well after the review was posted, my review was linked to a very different girl from the same agency.  I pointed this out to ter and they corrected it.  Had some read my review prior to the correction, some would have accused me of writing a "fake" review, but I didn't.  I think someone from the agency (or a proxy) was trying to link good reviews to a sub-par girl.  

I have found ter very helpful in correcting this sort of thing if they can.  They obviously cannot stop fake pics, but they seem willing to correct incorrect links, etc.  I think hobbyists should keep an eye on their reviews and let ter know if they are being abused by agencies, etc.

I have seen many K-girls and will say that I have rarely come accross any when the door opened that were not the girl in pics. I can understand the need to keep there appearance private if they fear anyone back home finding out, but all in all I have not been dissapointed by any of there looks.

Quote:

Though because there were long-time hobbyists that gave her good reviews and said it was her (or at least looked like her), I was very tempted.

I suppose it could be her photos, but a google search pops up those same photos all over the place, unlike if you search for the established providers, the only results come up for that person on cityvibe.

I used to think, that although images may be of an actress or model, why can't it be that the person has decided to provide and wants to use an alias?  Who's to say that Sayaka Ando hasn't decided to provide?  



Quote:

Related Link: http://www.eros-lasvegas.com/files/226777.htm