known provider who has had many scores of 10/10 or
very close to it. The recent review was a 4/3.
Now 10/10 may be somewhat of an exaggeration
since beauty is in the eye of the beholder and certain guidelines are supposed to keep us from
giving out 10's indiscriminately. However, how can someone go from "one in a lifetime" to 4/3. It defies logic. In addition the description of the provider is not even correct. I know. I've been there, seen that, done that. When a score that is so far off from what seems to be the norm for a provider there should be some scrutiny by whomever is screening the reviews. I've had reviews denied for much less than what I have described.
Recently there was a review of a pretty well
known provider who has had many scores of 10/10 or
very close to it. The recent review was a 4/3.
Now 10/10 may be somewhat of an exaggeration
since beauty is in the eye of the beholder and certain guidelines are supposed to keep us from
giving out 10's indiscriminately. However, how can someone go from "one in a lifetime" to 4/3. It defies logic. In addition the description of the provider is not even correct. I know. I've been there, seen that, done that. When a score that is so far off from what seems to be the norm for a provider there should be some scrutiny by whomever is screening the reviews. I've had reviews denied for much less than what I have described.
I got "moderated" for my curiosity!
Unfortunately he knew who he was talking about.
Sounded more like a vendetta rather than a
review. I'm sure they won't remove what he will say
is his opinion but something's not right.
I have never seen the provider involved. She certainly does have alluring photos. But are they recent or accurate? I don't know. However, in my experience there is some rather rampant grade inflation of "appearance", and a troubling number of ladies who post inaccurate photos. There is a similar situation with a recent review of a NY girl, who I HAVE seen, and in that case the recent (low) review happens to be spot on. It is entirely possible that the new reviewer of this LA provider is simply being truthful and if so he should be commended for pointing out the deceptive advertising.
If the provider truly wants to prove that her photos are accurate and that the review rating is in appropriate, she simply needs to have someone take a bikini shot of her holding a card with today's date on it, and post that as her rebuttal. Then each of us can make our decision as to whether her website photos are representative and whether she is a 4 or a 10
The photos are accurate and recent since she hasn't been in
the business too long. I remember when she had her photo shoot.
Don't forget I've seen her. She may not be a 10 to all but she certainly
isn't a 4/3. I wouldn't be writing this if I didn't know first hand how inaccurate
the review was. I've been doing this long enough for most of the regular
hobbyists to know that I'm not shilling for anyone and I never mentioned any
names.
The truth will set you free.
If the provider truly wants to prove that her photos are accurate and that the review rating is in appropriate, she simply needs to have someone take a bikini shot of her holding a card with today's date on it, and post that as her rebuttal. Then each of us can make our decision as to whether her website photos are representative and whether she is a 4 or a 10
Yes, you are clearly a veteran, and your argument could be fairly convincing, however.....
You also assigned a "10" appearance rating to another provider about whom there had been a couple similar threads a few months back. And I HAVE seen that provider, and I agree more with the reviewers who assigned the low scores than I agree with your "10". So in my mind the jury is still out. I will watch for the bikini shot holding a card with the date. And I stand by my thoughts on grade inflation.
You have seen dozens of ladies, virtually all of whom you rated 9s or 10s for appearance. Never had a single bad experience? Never a provider who didn't live up to her photos? Never? Wow, you are fortunate. I hope you can keep up your lucky streak
the business too long. I remember when she had her photo shoot.
Don't forget I've seen her. She may not be a 10 to all but she certainly
isn't a 4/3. I wouldn't be writing this if I didn't know first hand how inaccurate
the review was. I've been doing this long enough for most of the regular
hobbyists to know that I'm not shilling for anyone and I never mentioned any
names.
The truth will set you free.
If the provider truly wants to prove that her photos are accurate and that the review rating is in appropriate, she simply needs to have someone take a bikini shot of her holding a card with today's date on it, and post that as her rebuttal. Then each of us can make our decision as to whether her website photos are representative and whether she is a 4 or a 10
Carry on inspector because "veteran" may not necessarily mean wise nor good it could also mean one has been around long enough to have become part of the system and lost all sense of objectivity , or that he is in the pocket of bookers/agencies , who pay him with free and discounted sessions, in return for favorable reviews especially the initial ones for newbies.
However, you must also take into consideration that in order not to destroy a career some guys only post reviews of favorable experiences which may mistakenly give the impression that all their experiences are stellar.
I am not trying to insinuate anything nor cast doubt on the credibility of the reviews of this or any other veteran , but will misquote the Gipper by saying verify and then trust.
Carry on with your investigation , the truth will free us.
You also assigned a "10" appearance rating to another provider about whom there had been a couple similar threads a few months back. And I HAVE seen that provider, and I agree more with the reviewers who assigned the low scores than I agree with your "10". So in my mind the jury is still out. I will watch for the bikini shot holding a card with the date. And I stand by my thoughts on grade inflation.
You have seen dozens of ladies, virtually all of whom you rated 9s or 10s for appearance. Never had a single bad experience? Never a provider who didn't live up to her photos? Never? Wow, you are fortunate. I hope you can keep up your lucky streak
the business too long. I remember when she had her photo shoot.
Don't forget I've seen her. She may not be a 10 to all but she certainly
isn't a 4/3. I wouldn't be writing this if I didn't know first hand how inaccurate
the review was. I've been doing this long enough for most of the regular
hobbyists to know that I'm not shilling for anyone and I never mentioned any
names.
The truth will set you free.
If the provider truly wants to prove that her photos are accurate and that the review rating is in appropriate, she simply needs to have someone take a bikini shot of her holding a card with today's date on it, and post that as her rebuttal. Then each of us can make our decision as to whether her website photos are representative and whether she is a 4 or a 10
It isn't always "grade inflation." Sometimes it's just selectivity. I, for one, will not write a review if I have a sub-par experience. A while back, I gave a girl a "7" -- which isn't even that bad -- and she was practically in tears over it. Never again. The hobby isn't fun if you're making young girls cry.
The only time I would write a negative review is if it was a total rip off. Luckily, that has never happened to me. I also usually wait until I have seen a girl 3 or 4 times before I write a review, since the experience generally gets better over time. Maybe the first experience was an awkward 6, but by the time we get to the third or fourth date, it's now an 8 or 9. That happens all the time.
Ever think of this? I just don't bother to review what
I'm not quite satisfied with. I am mostly satisfied
because I do my homework and follow the lead
of experienced and respected hobbyists.
That eliminates most of the guesswork.
Please PM me the lady whose score you question.
Everyone's experience may differ but I stand by my
scores.