Minnesota

I have posted reviews with way more details
Rxyman 92 Reviews 1305 reads
posted
1 / 17

How did this review get approved. No details about anything except we should all see this girl because he like her massage skills. Nothing about h/e or any other details. A completely useless review.

bfw 9 Reviews 764 reads
posted
2 / 17
palski1 609 reads
posted
3 / 17
wingman1346 85 Reviews 930 reads
posted
4 / 17

Maybe there weren't any to write about.

freefallin25 20 Reviews 606 reads
posted
5 / 17

Read that one just a couple hours ago and thought the same thing!

oleoneeye 152 Reviews 706 reads
posted
6 / 17

But this is obviously a self-review and appears to be by whoever is running the establishment.  Reads like an infomercial.  Total BS

patrico 15 Reviews 539 reads
posted
7 / 17

All are for massages most are DIY.  The adds all look similar and all his reviews tell me nothing but shes great go see her yada yada.  I suspect they are all fake and the lack of detail makes me suspect a female wrote all of them.  Most guys like describing a woman's body in more detail even the DIY reviews talk about how hot she was or how great her ass or rack looked.  So how do we report reviews we think are fake anyway??

backbend 43 Reviews 519 reads
posted
8 / 17

I clicked on "report a problem" and the system basically said "were on it".

WYSIWYGG 26 Reviews 680 reads
posted
10 / 17
ThreeCupsPlease 635 reads
posted
11 / 17

I think it's very amusing that you and the four people that agree with you want to rewrite a review done by a person who has submitted 33 reviews, since 2005.  More importantly, the person who submitted the review actually saw the provider.

You are suggesting that the management of this forum should substitute your judgment of the provider for the judgment of the person who actually saw the provider, and submitted a review.  This website is available around the world and its popularity is based upon the premise that the person who writes a review knows what he is talking about. The primary method for the reviewer to meet that standard is to have seen the provider and engaged in activities with the provider.

If you don't believe or agree with the submitted review, why not go see the provider and then write your own review? Then, if your experience differs from that of the posted reviewer, you are allowed to describe each your contrary experience for all to read.

As an alternative, you could start your own website. It could be called "The Erotic Second Hand Story."

How is it that the process in place, as I described it, just doesn't work for you?

rmh222 9 Reviews 898 reads
posted
12 / 17

and had it rejected by TER for "lack of intimate details:!! Do they not proof reviews anymore and just publish any old lame BS???

oleoneeye 152 Reviews 643 reads
posted
14 / 17

More than just the OP found the review to be suspect. Who made you the board mod?

Posted By: ThreeCupsPlease
I think it's very amusing that you and the four people that agree with you want to rewrite a review done by a person who has submitted 33 reviews, since 2005.  More importantly, the person who submitted the review actually saw the provider.

You are suggesting that the management of this forum should substitute your judgment of the provider for the judgment of the person who actually saw the provider, and submitted a review.  This website is available around the world and its popularity is based upon the premise that the person who writes a review knows what he is talking about. The primary method for the reviewer to meet that standard is to have seen the provider and engaged in activities with the provider.

If you don't believe or agree with the submitted review, why not go see the provider and then write your own review? Then, if your experience differs from that of the posted reviewer, you are allowed to describe each your contrary experience for all to read.

As an alternative, you could start your own website. It could be called "The Erotic Second Hand Story."

How is it that the process in place, as I described it, just doesn't work for you?

Pollenbroker 20 Reviews 638 reads
posted
15 / 17
backbend 43 Reviews 996 reads
posted
16 / 17

The review is still live and well last I checked.

WYSIWYGG 26 Reviews 987 reads
posted
17 / 17
Register Now!