It's hard to get differentiation with the clowns who give 19 out of every 20 providers straight 10s.
Not to add to confuse an already inflated system, but do any of you mongers out there find yourself in the middle as to what to give a girl (score wise) in the looks department. I hate over inflation, and understanding it is what it is, some girls I find super attractive and a GND type but I feel that an 8 would be disrespectful (in her eyes) and a 9 would be inflation. Sometimes I wish we could write in scores as in 8.5, 8.7, etc. Probably silly but idk, thoughts?
... from writing in numbers like 8.5, 8.7 in the Juicy Details? I've seen some reviews that did just that.
You can certainly do that in the details section. Additionally I think you are trying to fine-tune a data element that by nature is not well defined anyhow -- that 8.5 to you is a 7.1 or a 9.8 or a 8.2 or 8.7 to someone else. Last, there was a study done years ago about rating systems in the financial world that pretty much said all the information is better encapsulated in a three start than in a five star system. We have a 10 star system you're wanting to turn into a 100 stat system.
Just keep it simple on the forms and do what ever you want to do in your text.
lady I will view her website photos to see if Mr. Happy approves. I can judge for myself if I am attracted to her.
If so, then I will read several of her reviews to see if I think there is anticipated chemistry. If so, game on. I will send an email to see if she is available when I am.
There is a lot of inflation. Which makes all scores relative. I usually round up or err on the side that benefits the person.
It's hard to get differentiation with the clowns who give 19 out of every 20 providers straight 10s.