This is not representative of the typical internet hobbyist, is it?
Granted, mug shots are not flattering even for Hollywood's Beautiful People (see Nick Nolte, Yasmine Bleeth, etc), but.... Is this what typically shows up for the providers???
suspect they are patrons of streetwalkers lets face it were much more sophisticated
...but heck, some people just don't look their best in a mug shot. Give them a break, and the name of a good lawyer!
these people are not caught at their finest moments. Who wouldn't look a little dour. It's not like the photographer was waving a little sock puppet to make them smile.
What was that thing Jerry Seinfeld said once about 90% of people are undatable? Maybe this is the proof. Without alcohol, the human race would have gone extinct ages ago.
and the 10% that are datable just happen to be some of the greatest providers ever! they are smart, funny, wise, kind and did I mention great looking! And me? Except for that green thing.... I do look good - even in a mug shot...
I think this is the clientele that would be dropped in the first round of any screening. They are the ones that are going to bear the brunt of this shame campaign.
There are very few minority hobbyist. The demographics are 40-70 year old married white men.
LowProfile Girl has hit the nail on the head...those guys were most probably nabbed for soliciting streetwalkers. Someone else said it..they would not pass the first line of screening for the quality ladies.
...whose mug shots we saw a few months back, none of these chaps are smiling.
Are there no Happy Hobbyists in Chicago?