New York

Oh... I know what you're alluding to...
LondonJames See my TER Reviews 341 reads
posted

And while I personally did not retweet it, I understood why it was posted. The specific provider possibly in question is based in another country (if this is the exact tweet I think it is). And honestly, it doesn't really matter.

I really had to stop and sit with this this after reading the original post. Understandably, a person's perspective is their reality. So, if it comes off as contempt to you, it is; although, I'm wondering where that feeling really stems from. Personally, I find the word "contempt" used in this matter to be rather... strong. No, it came off as a woman being real, authentic, and blunt with clients. A "straight up... here are the facts" sentiment. I truly don't believe she was trying to make anyone "feel some type of way' and if it did make a person feel a certain way, they might want to sit with that. I'm especially intrigued as to why you had such a strong reaction.  

Also, I think it is pertinent to address one of your statements, "No one asked you to come here...": Many providers are actually asked to come out to a certain location. Yes, sometimes those asking are willing to fly a provider in if they are the only one requesting or want the provider only to themselves. However, sometimes providers receive emails upon emails, or DMs upon DMs, or PMs upon PMs, directly asking if and when they are coming to a certain city. One there is a clear outpouring of interest, then it makes sense for a provider to tour. So, assuming that "no one asks" a provider to come to a certain location, or that they are touring because it is slow is not always par for the course.  

From what I understood, providers are not complaining of their right to charge more. No, they are defending their right to do so from those who ask, "Why?" I thought her breakdown of the reasoning was rather endearing because she was being honest.  

To be honest, I'm still not entirely sure what the issue with is with the tweet. It didn't seem offensive at all. I literally looked at it, mulled it over, viewed it from her perspective, then from mine, realized where it was coming from for her and others, understood it, and then gave a quick shoulder shrug and kept scrolling.  

Hopefully, next time you will too.  

LJ, xox

A little stroll on the twitter verse shows the contempt they have for the people that fund their lifestyle

Not naming names since they are being re-tweeted by self-absorbed females and cause ter won't allow it too ( more like the 2nd reason than the first )

Here's a better take on it:
No one ask you to come here, and if someone did they can make a personal deposit for that, you on the other hand have no right to make such a statement b/c NO ONE asked you to tour in the first place.  

You really aren't "touring"  you are just coming in either because its slow where you live and no one is booking you OR you are coming in for other personal matters ( and using that as a reason to do some extra "work$" )

And lets not kid ourselves a "touring" PV is just a ( classier worded ) form of a SW who walks from one block to the next.   Its like a SW adding 5.50 bucks to her rate because she had to take the bus/train from one block to the next to work because the other block was slower.... :)

A better way instead of complaining your right to charging more is JUST DON'T COME then, then you don't need to make such pitiful excuses/reasoning

Anyone venture to guess how old this lonely troll is  

It's Saturday night dude  

Go to the movies  

Or go bowling

Or go to Newark and get more crack and blast off

Many touring Provides adjust their rates upward in cities with higher costs, e.g., NYC.  

I don't do twitter so I don't know what was said there. Was she complaining about the higher costs in NY, SF, etc.? Or was she complaining about "us", her customers?

Posted By: MidAgedCEO
A little stroll on the twitter verse shows the contempt they have for the people that fund their lifestyle  
   
 Not naming names since they are being re-tweeted by self-absorbed females and cause ter won't allow it too ( more like the 2nd reason than the first )  
   
 Here's a better take on it:  
 No one ask you to come here, and if someone did they can make a personal deposit for that, you on the other hand have no right to make such a statement b/c NO ONE asked you to tour in the first place.    
   
 You really aren't "touring"  you are just coming in either because its slow where you live and no one is booking you OR you are coming in for other personal matters ( and using that as a reason to do some extra "work$" )  
   
 And lets not kid ourselves a "touring" PV is just a ( classier worded ) form of a SW who walks from one block to the next.   Its like a SW adding 5.50 bucks to her rate because she had to take the bus/train from one block to the next to work because the other block was slower.... :)  
   
 A better way instead of complaining your right to charging more is JUST DON'T COME then, then you don't need to make such pitiful excuses/reasoning

We won't be meeting on my tour in NYC next month, feel free to follow me on twitter, I would be honored to have a passive post written about me, you might even find some things on my page that anger you more than tours! @meetanarenee

-- Modified on 4/1/2017 11:52:06 PM

And while I personally did not retweet it, I understood why it was posted. The specific provider possibly in question is based in another country (if this is the exact tweet I think it is). And honestly, it doesn't really matter.

I really had to stop and sit with this this after reading the original post. Understandably, a person's perspective is their reality. So, if it comes off as contempt to you, it is; although, I'm wondering where that feeling really stems from. Personally, I find the word "contempt" used in this matter to be rather... strong. No, it came off as a woman being real, authentic, and blunt with clients. A "straight up... here are the facts" sentiment. I truly don't believe she was trying to make anyone "feel some type of way' and if it did make a person feel a certain way, they might want to sit with that. I'm especially intrigued as to why you had such a strong reaction.  

Also, I think it is pertinent to address one of your statements, "No one asked you to come here...": Many providers are actually asked to come out to a certain location. Yes, sometimes those asking are willing to fly a provider in if they are the only one requesting or want the provider only to themselves. However, sometimes providers receive emails upon emails, or DMs upon DMs, or PMs upon PMs, directly asking if and when they are coming to a certain city. One there is a clear outpouring of interest, then it makes sense for a provider to tour. So, assuming that "no one asks" a provider to come to a certain location, or that they are touring because it is slow is not always par for the course.  

From what I understood, providers are not complaining of their right to charge more. No, they are defending their right to do so from those who ask, "Why?" I thought her breakdown of the reasoning was rather endearing because she was being honest.  

To be honest, I'm still not entirely sure what the issue with is with the tweet. It didn't seem offensive at all. I literally looked at it, mulled it over, viewed it from her perspective, then from mine, realized where it was coming from for her and others, understood it, and then gave a quick shoulder shrug and kept scrolling.  

Hopefully, next time you will too.  

LJ, xox

Quote "And lets not kid ourselves a "touring" PV is just a ( classier worded ) form of a SW who walks from one block to the next.   Its like a SW adding 5.50 bucks to her rate because she had to take the bus/train from one block to the next to work because the other block was slower.... :)"

Do SW's pay out hundreds of dollars for airfare, cover the cost of a 4 or 5 star hotel and lavish themselves in luxury lingerie, high end clothes and shoes?

Do they spend out hundreds of dollars for the up keep of facials and manicures etc?

As for you saying that they have no right to make such a statement, they have every right, the same as you have the right to come on here and sit behind your computer in your week old underwear and drill this garbage out :-)

A pig is still a PIG no matter what amount of lipstick ( manicure, facials ) or "dress" costume ( high end clothes/lingerie ) as you put on it ... lol

You didn't do yourself any favor with that.... honey

And baby if you need to do all that "just to look pretty", well you're the ugly one trying the darndest to make yourself somewhat presentable  

Most guys couldn't tell the difference btw a loubiie than something from DSW, you needing all that stuff just shows how insecure you are in the inside  

AGAIN if you need to complain how "hard" it is just to look good... ummmm maybe you should stop trying :)

Lmfao, how bitter and twisted does someone have to be to end up like you.

And i didn't say anywhere that i need all those things, i was just pointing out the obvious to the stupid ;-)

Some people can afford a Rolls Royce and some who can afford refuse to pay for it, Strictly a matter of choice.

But seriously, I am always thoroughly fascinated when I witness someone who seems to be confused by the reality that cost of living varies depending on where one is located. Or even the fact that travelling is more expensive than being situated in one's home base. Currently, I'm on a mini-tour. I have three different rate levels as navigating the small Southern city I live in isn't the same as navigating the million plus Midwestern city I visited last week, which isn't the same as getting around from point A to point B or staying at a hotel in an 8 million plus, behemoth Northern city. I wouldn't complain about charging different rates in one city versus another. But for a client to assert that he can't empathize with a companion's logic for adjusting their rates while being on the road is silly. Even business travelers who aren't or have never been heaux can attest to the fact that more expenses are incurred while being on the road.  

The thing that really has me raising my eyebrow though is the high-key shade that is being thrown at street-based/ outdoor sex workers to even attempt to prove the shoddy point put forth in the original post. Because it's not like sex workers don't still deserve dignity even though they may lack access to working indoors.  

-- Modified on 4/4/2017 2:47:59 PM

JenericJohn161 reads

Why has this user has gone back to Twitter after one tweet set off a furious reaction?

I'm guessing his domme provider is on hiatus because going back to Twitter a second time indicates a deep need to have his sensibilities cut up like so much confetti.

Live your life and let other people live theirs.

If you don't "agree" on something then don't involve yourself with it.  

 
In the nicest way I can phrase it :)

Register Now!