Los Angeles

Realistically
justsauce16 4 Reviews 364 reads
posted

Realistically, performance reviews should be itemized.

So a max-safe provider could have scores for lfk, cbj and cfs. Take those numbers, divide by the number of services provided and bam, an accurate aggregate score for the services she provides, and a searchable individual score.

If you're a GFE provider you could have scores for everything under the sun, it wouldn't change your min/max score just because you speak greek. Similarly, if you offer greek and aren't good at it, you'll get low scores for it.

A fun side effect of all this is we can have search capability for something like BBBJ, so if that's the service you're after you can find the best possible provider to suit your needwants.

Is it just me or is it getting harder to give a high performance rating?!?

Now it's not good enough that the provider "brings out the gimp" but the gimp also has to participate directly with the two of you (and you have to be wearing a ball-gag) to warrant a point...

She has to have at least one blood relative join in (1st cousin or closer) for another possible point.

You have to use both ends of a double ended dildo in each of your asses for another possible point.

TER admin also mentioned something about her household pet getting involved for another possible point and if you want to give her a 10 - you have to somehow talk her next door neighbours (on both sides) into joining in as well...

I guess 8 is my max performance score these days - Pffftttttt... (French Flat Tire)

-- Modified on 3/26/2017 11:47:41 PM

ShillBill440 reads

Dfk and bbbj and you can give her a 9.  You just won't be able to hand out  10/10s  like it appears you like to do. Now if you take a trip to Greece with your partner, than you can give her a 10/10.

Posted By: tankbinding
Is it just me or is it getting harder to give a high performance rating?!?  
   
 Now it's not good enough that the provider "brings out the gimp" but the gimp also has to participate directly with the two of you (and you have to be wearing a ball-gag) to warrant a point...  
   
 She has to have at least one blood relative join in (1st cousin or closer) for another possible point.  
   
 You have to use both ends of a double ended dildo in each of your asses for another possible point.  
   
 TER admin also mentioned something about her household pet getting involved for another possible point and if you want to give her a 10 - you have to somehow talk her next door neighbours (on both sides) into joining in as well...  
   
 I guess 8 is my max performance score these days - Pffftttttt... (French Flat Tire)

-- Modified on 3/26/2017 11:47:41 PM

providers advertising GFE sessions allow DFK and BBBJ.  We just look for GFE in a provider's ad when we book, or else check her profile if she's established with a lot of reviews.

Realistically, performance reviews should be itemized.

So a max-safe provider could have scores for lfk, cbj and cfs. Take those numbers, divide by the number of services provided and bam, an accurate aggregate score for the services she provides, and a searchable individual score.

If you're a GFE provider you could have scores for everything under the sun, it wouldn't change your min/max score just because you speak greek. Similarly, if you offer greek and aren't good at it, you'll get low scores for it.

A fun side effect of all this is we can have search capability for something like BBBJ, so if that's the service you're after you can find the best possible provider to suit your needwants.

that I submit has a minimum back and forth with TER of 3 times!

Let me be clear here:

I am looking for a GFE connection! I carefully pick out the providers for their supermodel looks and the potential to "feel" like I am making wild passionate love to a woman that is madly in love with me and can't get enough of me in every way!

That is a 10 in every sense of a sane performance scoring system...

To have some knob chip down my scores because I didn't mention BBBJ or because I didn't insert my dick in her ass or because she didn't have another guy join us is beyond retarded!!

This is a subjective scoring system people and with me - most people know what they are getting and just because I am a Sex God doesn't mean I have to write about out in a review (that's what PM's are for)...

Lastly, Dr Archer - You will soon understand everything I am saying because I'm picking you when you get here - just be gentle with me and lets leave the gimp in the closet :))

You are a good man.

Sometimes those acronyms break the flow of composition and dampen the mood one would like to create with words, if even possible

Is it true that all TER administrators have to be virgins?!?

CaptainRenault284 reads

No, just robots.....

The obvious solution is to divorce the point award from the services offered. I.e., leave the point scoring to the hobbyist. If the girl rocked his world, he gives a ten, but he must check every service possibly offered, yes or no.  So, the reader of the review knows whether dfk, bbbj, anal, etc is offered or not, which is what he wants to know to make an educated choice.  Thus, the reader can gauge the enthusiasm/delight level, and also know that the provider will do X, Y and Z -- which are essentials to this hobbyist -- whereas she won't do A, B or C -- which he couldn't care less about.  

This would give the reader MORE info, not less, because he'd get a more accurate take on how the girl performed in terms of enthusiasm, while still seeing a punch list.  

But, no, TER has to robotically adjust the scoring system, in my opinion in a manner that gives us less. Makes no sense.....

-- Modified on 3/27/2017 9:39:27 PM

-- Modified on 3/27/2017 9:41:27 PM

Register Now!