Ok, I will be the first to admit that I don't always get the big picture right in situations, and that I am perhaps too "Hamlet-esque" in thinking about things...but something about this seems a bit off.

The client, or ex-client it would seem, that has made these posts has painted Miss Giddy as more than a bit of a dangerous sociopath, but also says that she told his wife he had been a client for two years, which he didn't deny in any posts.
In those two years there was no hint that a "psycho-bitch" was lurking just beneath the surface?
He does well to cover his tracks a bit by saying it was greed, that when the money stopped the threat became reality....but that in her time working no one else had an issue with her? her greed became so boundless just with this one client in this one situation?

Even if she did everything he states, and at this point I guess I have no reason to believe she didn't, I find it hard to wrap my brain around this one client being such a regular as losing him and the vast amounts of money he provided to her would be the impetus for this "change" in behavior, on the basis of "greed".
Lose one client, even a regular, and have greed cause her to behave in a manner that will cost her all her clients, present and future? The only way, right now, I could see that as being such a blow to her as to cause her to act in what it would seem would be an uncharacteristic manner (which I assume since he doesn't say she was always this way) would be if he was perhaps more than a client, if the relationship had entered either a "mistress" arrangement or an affair.

The other thing I notice is, in all his posts about this, he never says anything to imply he was anything but the perfect client...not even a small mention that he blurred lines, or accepted "off the clock time"  or anything else that might cast any possible light on why her "business relationship" with him, and the ending thereof would bring forth such an over the top reaction from her.

His post could almost be read as, "I was a ideal client and she went crazy for no reason other than  I didn't want to see her again."

That, and if she is so dangerous as to necessitate a protective order,and has his wife terrified and he living in fear, would one then go out of his way to repeatedly poke the bear with a pointy stick?  Restaining orders, don't stop bullets, don't act as life preservers, won't set off an alarm if the person the order is against does something, it will just add another chrage to whatever the person would be arreseted for...so if he and his wife are in such fear, and a protective provides no actual protection, why would he play a game of "Taunt the Psycho"?  Because he is such a good guy he will risk his wife's and his own well being so his TER brethren can be warmed against this dangerous woman? If so he is one hell of a good guy, the picture of selfless duty to others...which I guess would go along with his being the perfect client.

That he has made this post on many boards, and used an alias with her name in it, it seems less a warning to others than a pointed effort to exact what he may on her.

I admit, I could be completely wrong, but something about the way he has posted this and what he has written seems less than forthright, and it reads as if a number of chapters are missing from the book.

cunt>. I mean country >> there are no VICTIMS, only VOLUNTEERS.!

I know a ebony beauty named Skyler , comes from Vegas that had all her reviewes taken down , Hopr TER sees the error of their ways now that we see the chick in question is white

What You All May Not Know

is this guy has spammed this information on literally every escort board he can post on. The information recieved by another board was that  Rooster ( as he goes by on TBD) had a Personal relationship with the lady in question. Taken from another board:

We were also advised by another board:

"it is semi-well known amongst the dallas hobby community that giddyupcasey and rooster had a not so secret personal relationship that went beyond provider/hobbyist... and that this post is really more personal and not so altruistic on roosters part."

So you take nthis post and subsequentposts with a grain of salt and hope that these 2 people havent set out to destroy one another.

But if they have, let's not give them any more ammunition to shoot themselves.

**Edited to remove little man's name because I was wrong in assuming he was the party in which the original post came from. Im very sorry little man.

-- Modified on 10/31/2005 8:10:40 AM