And you found out who, would you trust seeing her in the future
Are you talking about "The rumors have been confirmed" thread (below) and the alleged snitch? Like the others: never.
To elaborate: the girl's action and its consequences was way out of proportion to anything that I can imagine might have been used by her to justify the action. Very questionable judgement. Better choices? Quit. Walk away. Say goodbye. Join another group.
Makes we wonder what she'd do to me if I used an extra towel or wash cloth without permission.
If not she should think about leaving town. 
But then that is often the case as providers either change agencies or go independent.
I would bet on that more than out of the industry.
-- Modified on 2/17/2017 9:21:54 AM
the were investigated. I too had that same feeling that a provider started it. Ladies have been know while working for an agency to take off with cash, get angry because the agency does not want to work with them anymore and they lady turns on them. I know they were around for a while and never heard anything bad about them.
This hobby is suppose to be about having fun outside of a world that's chaotic, stressful and BS.
I just don't get it. 
"Could not understand why they were investigated" ? WTF .,,,???The Waltham police got a complaint of illegal activities, they were investigated, they were found to be suspected of running a prostitution ring. The charges of money laundering (et al) speak for themselves. All of this is ILLEGAL! Plenty of posts on here claiming the agency had it coming because of the treatment of the girls. Others posts support them.
If you read my post you should I have "I" never heard anything bad about them, but than again I'm not local to Boston. Usually when I read of agencies getting busted they mention the mistreatment of girls. I read no such thing, not that it did not happen.
There is always two sides to a story. Given my lack of knowledge of the situation I digress. I commented based on what I know.
Girls don't "start investigations" and if they get involved with the courts, their name generally have to appear in public documents.
In the NYC AMP bust last year (resulting primarily in Fed money charges), were able to threaten a mama-san with other charges. Another was also squeezed. The court papers only named Cooperating Witness-1 and Cooperating Source-1, not their actual names. I forget which one was the mama-san, CW or CS. Everyone involved easily figured out who it was even without the name in the records.
In the Seattle AMP busts, the named names were the American guys charged with running / facilitating the operations. Although 12 K-girls were detained, none of their names were released and none were asked to testify. They were even offered counseling and aid.
I don't know what determines whether or not a name is released. Witness protection? Importance to the prosecution's case?
Anyway ... the actions of the snitch are bad for EVERYONE. It raises attention and awareness in a bad way. It probably gives local LE more cred to ask for more task forces and budget increases from the DAs and local tax base.
I think police test all these cases the same . It doesn't matter the girls were working of their own free will. They treat all these cases as if they are smuggled in from Russia.
Probably if the Girl was mad enough, they would drop a dime on the Agency, but most, if not all, would not want to be the star witness!
However, the AG's Office cannot prove their case, without direct testimony, which means that the Attorney General's office needs first hand accounts, such as one of the ladies testifying!
The general records of telephone calls, the receipts, the web page, would not be sufficient proof for the juries, or withstand the appeal process.
The AG's Office needs the "rest of the story"!!!!!!!!
No money has to be exchanged to get charge with a crime. They don't need anyone to testify against them. The AG's have have phone records,text messages and emails from clients and girls. In addition I'm sure it won't be hard to get one of the girls and tell them if you cooperate we won't press charges on you . IMHO
However, the AG's Office cannot prove their case, without direct testimony, which means that the Attorney General's office needs first hand accounts, such as one of the ladies testifying!
The general records of telephone calls, the receipts, the web page, would not be sufficient proof for the juries, or withstand the appeal process.
The AG's Office needs the "rest of the story"!!!!!!!!
The AG has to be able to identify who sent the text or emails, not just whose phone it was sent from, or whose computer. Not as slam dunk as you think. In fact sicking the IRS on them is generally more of a concern to a defendant.
They need testimony from live witnesses even with wiretapping, etc.
Remember this trafficking too, so there must be evidence to support that crime, not just garnering support from prostitution.
It isn't as easy as it first appears, unless the HEADLINES is what they were really after in the first place.
The AG office can certainly coerce a plea by telling the defendants that by going to trial their sentence will be twice than if they plead out.
Dude ; you are way off the mark !! Do you honestly think the mass AG spent all this time and resources since September culminating in a raid, without the facts to make it stick ? The substantial charges are the money laundering and the deriving financial benefit from prostitution. I have not heard if the 2 are still incarcerated. There is a cash bail. I am unsure if the 2 have financial resources to fight it all the way through the appeal process .
However, the AG's Office cannot prove their case, without direct testimony, which means that the Attorney General's office needs first hand accounts, such as one of the ladies testifying!
The general records of telephone calls, the receipts, the web page, would not be sufficient proof for the juries, or withstand the appeal process.
The AG's Office needs the "rest of the story"!!!!!!!!
I once left an appointment 4-5 years ago with a lady from out of town working in a very nice hotel with 200 rooms and 5 elevators at least and she was pretty, classy quiet and very discreet.
Security and the local police were at her door 1-2 hours after our appointment. Her 2nd of the day with only one more booked for later I.e. Not a ton of traffic but her stalker boyfriend in Georgia called every hotel in the area asking for her by her real name until he found her and then called security and they are required to call the law.
She was give an arrest " ticket" non physical arrest and trespassed by the hotel chain . She called me as she had literally no one in the area to help relocate her and between lawyers and new lodging and being scared to death to continue the tour it was a mess.
The judge was not as lenient as originally expected and the fine was hefty and there was unsupervised parole too in order to get a cwof
Point being shit can happen to a provider from their world and be brought in to the services world and it can totally be an outside force that caused the mess.
If it was a girl that did it then she must have been in a legal bind herself or really felt victimized real or imagined
Always been a Huge Fan of 'Independent Ladies' and establishing good relationship with them (my likes & needs...their schedule, pampering they like etc..conversation topics & the obvious bwtn sheets). Agencies were never my thing and after feeling like I almost got caught in the middle of things, I'll be going back to sticking with independent providers. But definitely laying low around here for a bit..
There have been a couple "houses" shut down in Boston recently (Nov/Dec).
So LE seems to be stepping up their efforts.
Be safe out there...