There have always been rules governing the max scores, but what he's referring to is new.
xoOnce the calendar flipped to 2017, I've noticed some ladies who previously never offered greek (clear from their profile and reviews) all of a sudden started providing greek. Was it a New Year's resolution to offer more services? Or...did the new TER review rules have something to do with it? Either way, I guess you gotta do what you gotta do to keep getting those 10/10s, lol.
There have always been rules governing the max scores, but what he's referring to is new.
xo
Providers should be free to draw whatever boundaries feel right to them about their bodies without repercussions for their reviews, which are one of the most valuable types of advertising we have. It totally dovetails into the popular narrative that we are all coerced into our choice of profession, which, for most of us here, I don't believe to be true. That's why it really, really gets under my skin. TER should be our ally, not another obstacle to being faithful to our own sense of safety.
Reviews should be about quality of services, not quantity. Many of us have complained about the policy, but it seems to fall on deaf ears. If it sounds as stupid to you as it does to me, please reach out to them and add your voice.
xo
E
The idea is a reviewer should not have a "once in a lifetime" every week. The qualifications for additional points were based on extensive survey within the TER community.
Now I've seen new reviews for providers who are 10s, but haven't done all of the items checklisted... Is there something I'm missing here? There was only one women and one man in the session, and no one visited Greece. I thought there had to be a trip out of town, or multiple providers?
fall through the cracks, but lord knows how. I've seen the same where Greek travel and other special services were not mentioned and the score was a 10 even tho it seemed above minimal requirements. smh
In a recent review where I mentioned voracious kissing but did not use the acronym DFK, I was advised DOG was a scoring criterion. I included the acronym and the review was allowed a 9 for service although the session was far more passionate, hotter and more satisfying than some that offered Greek or even when I partook in Greek. Go figure.
-- Modified on 4/16/2017 4:43:16 AM
In order to keep our overall performance ratings consistent, we set up the following system: An escort provider is only eligible to earn up to a 7, unless she performs one or some of the following during a session: Kisses With Tongue, Bare-Back Blow Job, Really Bi, Anal Sex, or More than One Guy. For each of these services that are performed, her potential max score is raised by one point, with 10 as an absolute maximum. Remember, it’s your review; within these guidelines you still get to decide what her score should be. You do not have to give her the ‘extra point’. If your review rates a provider higher than her maximum score, the score will be adjusted down to her maximum.
There were lots of 10s before this rule, in fact too many. That is the reason for this rule which just started early this year I beleive
That still doesn't explain why I'm seeing new reviews that are tens where it was just a man and a woman and no trip to Greece.
should be a criterion for getting a 10. Are you telling me that a gal can make me cum 5 times in an hour and if I don't fuck her ass she doesn't deserve a 10 and the session was NOT a OIAL experience.
I think Admin's attempt to be more stringent is laudable to filter out bogus scores and scoring, but it fails to take into consideration the variables that are most important to clients when they evaluate a session.
Lastly, if a client doesn't enjoy anal, or l DISLIKES anal, this criterion negates the possibility that he'll EVER be able to score a session as a OIAL experience. I dont think so.
-- Modified on 4/16/2017 4:57:25 AM